>
> Is my simplistic picture correct?
Yes
> Or can the assembler words @ ! +!
> indeed be interrupted from within AmForth?
No
Matthias
___
Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/
Amforth-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists
On 19Oct18 19:32, Matthias Trute wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 19.10.2018, 14:46 +0200 schrieb Tristan:
> > Hello Martin,
> >
> > Very intriguing, just when I am away from my machine so I can’t test
> > things out!
> >
> > If I remember correctly, the default Amforth avr build uses (rx,tx)
> > interru
Am Freitag, den 19.10.2018, 14:46 +0200 schrieb Tristan:
> Hello Martin,
>
> Very intriguing, just when I am away from my machine so I can’t test
> things out!
>
> If I remember correctly, the default Amforth avr build uses (rx,tx)
> interrupts to handle the serial prompt. If at the serial prompt
Hello Martin,
Very intriguing, just when I am away from my machine so I can’t test things out!
If I remember correctly, the default Amforth avr build uses (rx,tx) interrupts
to handle the serial prompt. If at the serial prompt I type in the word -int
and “all” -int did was to issue the assemble
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 13:27:09 +0100
Tristan Williams wrote:
> On 17Oct18 10:25, Martin Nicholas via Amforth-devel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think that @ ! +! 2@ 2! d+! should disable interrupts on the AVR.
> > Although it's possible to code around a variable being changed by an
> > interrupt (usin
On 17Oct18 10:25, Martin Nicholas via Amforth-devel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think that @ ! +! 2@ 2! d+! should disable interrupts on the AVR.
> Although it's possible to code around a variable being changed by an
> interrupt (using C@ C! for example), the 16-bit counter registers can't
> be dealt with
Hi,
I think that @ ! +! 2@ 2! d+! should disable interrupts on the AVR.
Although it's possible to code around a variable being changed by an
interrupt (using C@ C! for example), the 16-bit counter registers can't
be dealt with in a similar way. Section 17.3 of the datasheet
"Accessing 16-bit Regis
