Remember in 2007- 2008 when the ARRL backed down from
their attempt to get FCC regulation by bandwidth?
At that time we heard a League official state
that we needn't expect a further effort by the ARRL to get
bandwidth controls into FCC rules for at least two years - not
until the League had a
Steve wrote in part:
Now in early 2010 that amount of time has passed and the
IARU plan is under review - interesting.
ARRL is publishing stuff about AM. This
must mean they are not against it. And if
that's the case then they had better not argue
in favor of 3 kc bandwidth limitation.
From: Jim Tonne to...@comcast.net
ARRL is publishing stuff about AM. This
must mean they are not against it. And if
that's the case then they had better not argue
in favor of 3 kc bandwidth limitation. That
would like shooting themselves in the foot.
...and we all know
I don't trust the ARRgghhL! No way, no how! Just my 50ยข worth.
Mod-U-Lator,
Mike(y)
W3SLK
==
Remember in 2007- 2008 when the ARRL backed down from
their attempt to get FCC regulation by bandwidth?
At that time we heard a League official state
Here's my feedback on the present Region 2 bandplan.
I submitted it to bandplan2...@arrl.org as was requested...
- - - - - - - - - - -
ARRL -
Feedback on IARU Region 2 bandplan
The actual need for bandplans has not been established, but if we
accept that one is desired, a bandplan should
Of course, a calling frequency is different then an operating
frequency. And, a calling frequency is a suggestion, not a mandate.
Pete, wa2cwa
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 14:02:38 -0500 Jim Tonne to...@comcast.net writes:
And having a single frequency (for
example 3885) for AM is the height of
Pete:
Yes, you are right. Now that I have given it a
bit more thought, that *was* a *calling*
frequency.
Which I find equally stupid, however, for the
usual, casual, rag-chewing AM operator !
I will confess I have an ARC-5 receiver sitting
on 3885. It also monitors 3870 on up to 3895,
perhaps someone would be kind enough to explain how a 3885 calling freq.
would work for me. I am at 3700 or 3705 80% of the time! just came back to
the house and there were three AM ers down in that area of the band, minimal
QRM and no SSB jammers, try it sometime. Bernie
- Original
If AM'ers feel that strongly against AM calling frequency designations,
they should petition the ARRL and the IARU to remove all of them from
their respective band plans. Personally, calling frequencies mean little
to me on the HF bands. I never use them. The casual AM'er just needs to
wander the
9 matches
Mail list logo