NPR hahahahaha
WW4Q
-Original Message-
From: amradio-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:amradio-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Brett Gazdzinski
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 8:22 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation
Long Live AM! God Save AM! Where would I be now if it were not for Late Night
Art Bell!
Barry Sherwood
KF5GC
--- On Sat, 3/20/10, Dominador Sagun dsa...@teltronics.com wrote:
From: Dominador Sagun dsa...@teltronics.com
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation
To: Brett Gazdzinski
: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
amradio@mailman.qth.net, Brett Gazdzinski brett.gazdzin...@verizon.net
Date: Saturday, March 20, 2010, 10:42 AM
You wouldn't believe the calls that
we get when we have to take one of our AM's off the air
after
: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation
I wonder where you got that information. Plenty of people listen to AM/FM
commercial AND LPFM. Even low power analog TV. If this will impact HAM
Radio, I can promise you there will be a war that will be all over the news
media and Internet. And I really hope
-
From: D. Chester k4...@charter.net
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thu, Mar 18, 2010 10:33 pm
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation
What is to interfere with?
All radio stuff is going 900 MHz or higher, cable satellite or fiber
feed,
spread spectrum, phasing noise and interference
PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation
I wonder where you got that information. Plenty of people listen to
AM/FM
commercial AND LPFM. Even low power analog TV. If this will impact HAM
Radio, I can promise you there will be a war that will be all over the
news
media and Internet. And I
From: Dominador Sagun dsa...@teltronics.com
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Fri, March 19, 2010 10:54:05 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation
After thinking about it, AM radio is a part of my life.
I listen
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:34 PM, BILL GUYGER bguy...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
The FCC Chairman just came out saying he sees broadband for all as
being the future and broadcasting as somewhere down the list probably
on the order of the Town Crier.
Your interpretation obviously, but okay, whatever.
K6HSG
- Original Message -
From: Rob Atkinson ranchoro...@gmail.com
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:34 PM, BILL GUYGER bguy
in my day to day interaction with my
neighbors.
73, John
K6HSG
- Original Message -
From: Rob Atkinson ranchoro...@gmail.com
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation
What, you want big government?
What are you, some sort of democrat?
Brett
- Original Message -
From: D. Chester k4...@charter.net
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation
What is to interfere with?
All radio stuff
Okay this is enough. What the hell is going on here of late??
Get back on AM discussion, that means Amateur Radio and operating AM. I
think one moderator has already sent a warning out, seeing that things were
starting to get out of hand. If this crap continues with any of you, I/we
will bump
What is to interfere with?
All radio stuff is going 900 MHz or higher, cable satellite or fiber feed,
spread spectrum, phasing noise and interference null, etc.
No one listens to AM anymore, or even FM much.
You think anyone is going to worry about ham radio?
I don't think so...
Brett
ending thread:)
--- On Thu, 3/18/10, D. Chester k4...@charter.net wrote:
From: D. Chester k4...@charter.net
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 10:33 PM
What is to interfere with?
All radio stuff is going 900 MHz or higher, cable
Not to detract from Steve's point, because I agree that RFI from
unintentional radiators is a major problem for hams, especially those
who enjoy full-range AM audio on HF. But it's important to understand
how the FCC approaches the wide range of Part 15 issues - here are a
couple of good
Still, the intent of Part 15 is to protect licensed users from
interference from unlicensed devices, and the best option we have to
enforce current regulations (or potentially get better ones) is to
continue to elevate our concerns to the FCC and those who oversee the
agency.
73, Bob W9RAN
I'll bet there is _a lot_ of money in the hands of industry lobbyists
who badly want that rule to not change.
rob
K5UJ
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Paul Christensen w...@arrl.net wrote:
Still, the intent of Part 15 is to protect licensed users from
interference from unlicensed devices,
- Original Message -
From: Paul Christensen w...@arrl.net
To: w9...@oneradio.net; Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation (was ILLEGAL STUFF ON E BAY)
Still, the intent of Part
18 matches
Mail list logo
