Re: [AMRadio] SDR IQ

2010-03-31 Thread Donald Chester
I wouldn't want to try to dive into a laptop and replace the sound card. To me, the innards of a laptop are close to the same as the innards of a ladies' swiss watch. But there are high end outboard card cards on the market that simply plug into a USB port.

Re: [AMRadio] SDR IQ

2010-03-31 Thread Donald Chester
I wouldn't want to try to dive into a laptop and replace the sound card. To me, the innards of a laptop are close to the same as the innards of a ladies' swiss watch. But there are high end outboard card cards on the market that simply plug into a USB port.

Re: [AMRadio] SDR IQ

2010-03-30 Thread D. Chester
From: Jay Bromley jayw5...@cox.net For years I have used SpectraPlus. They sure seem to be pricey these days, since I have purchased the software. Here is the link: http://www.spectraplus.com/ I guess 14 years or more has flown by since I purchased mine? Seems it was expensive then,

Re: [AMRadio] SDR IQ

2010-03-30 Thread Brett Gazdzinski
...@charter.net To: amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:24 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] SDR IQ From: Jay Bromley jayw5...@cox.net For years I have used SpectraPlus. They sure seem to be pricey these days, since I have purchased the software. Here is the link: http

Re: [AMRadio] SDR-IQ

2010-03-29 Thread D. Chester
Bernie, your experience with the SDR-IQ has about convinced me to save my money. I had entertained the idea of purchasing one, but maybe I'd better at least wait till they work some of the bugs out of it. Here is another digital gadget (software only) that I am considering. It would convert a

Re: [AMRadio] SDR-IQ

2010-03-29 Thread Bernie Doran
with it. It does make a great bandscope, and an excellent piece of test gear. And they are not terribly expensive. Bernie - Original Message - From: D. Chester k4...@charter.net To: amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 12:23 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] SDR-IQ Bernie, your

Re: [AMRadio] SDR-IQ

2010-03-29 Thread Jay Bromley
gadgets. 73 de jay.. -- From: D. Chester k4...@charter.net Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 11:23 AM To: amradio@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [AMRadio] SDR-IQ Bernie, your experience with the SDR-IQ has about convinced me to save my money. I had

Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-03-29 Thread Brett Gazdzinski
brett.gazdzin...@verizon.net; Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:22 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq yep yep yep. I have several of those little solid state audio amps. $ 5 and half a dozen caps and resistors near dc to channel 6

Re: [AMRadio] SDR-IQ

2010-03-29 Thread Brett Gazdzinski
...@charter.net To: amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 12:23 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] SDR-IQ Bernie, your experience with the SDR-IQ has about convinced me to save my money. I had entertained the idea of purchasing one, but maybe I'd better at least wait till they work some of the bugs

Re: [AMRadio] SDR-IQ

2010-03-29 Thread Brett Gazdzinski
...@embarqmail.com To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 1:10 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] SDR-IQ Don, Brett said they sound much better using WINRAD, but I have not been able to get it to run. The other thing, I wonder how many receivers Collins

Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-03-28 Thread Bernie Doran
brett.gazdzin...@verizon.net To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 9:16 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq Did you try adjusting the rf and IF gain settings? The IF gain adds a lot of noise using spectravue... Also, what programs did you

Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-03-28 Thread Bernie Doran
, 2010 10:07 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq Don't know enough about the 5000's receiver, but a couple years ago, I talked with W5GI on 3.880 as he was shaking out the prototype. None the old buzzards, nor I, could tell it from a plate-modulated rig. I've heard several on the air since

Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-03-28 Thread Bernie Doran
...@gmail.com To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 11:43 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq Hi Bernie, I have gone back and forth on the receive audio question with my rigs. I have never had a PC controlled receiver, but I have

Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-03-28 Thread Rob Atkinson
Atkinson ranchoro...@gmail.com To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 11:43 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq Hi Bernie, I have gone back and forth on the receive audio question with my rigs. I have never had a PC controlled

Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-03-28 Thread Bernie Doran
. iginal Message - From: Rob Atkinson ranchoro...@gmail.com To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 8:51 AM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq the Kenwood does indeed sound good for a s.s. ham transceiver; one of the hams who does work

Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-03-28 Thread Brett Gazdzinski
: Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq HI Brett: yep I have tried every setting that I can change. I have never been able to get WINRAD to run and I do have the rf-space downloads to run it. downloaded everything several times from different sources. as I said, the sdr filters work great

Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-03-28 Thread Bernie Doran
and connection one puts in there adds junk to the signal. Original Message - From: Brett Gazdzinski brett.gazdzin...@verizon.net To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 12:40 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq There is a trick

[AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-03-27 Thread Bernie Doran
well I am going to stir the pot again with my probable final comments on my SDR-IQ. first the good, never had a panadapter or bandscope, it works great for that. The filters are very good. The issues to me are the following, it is noisy, to itself and also to a receiver on the same antenna,

Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-03-27 Thread Brett Gazdzinski
:13 PM Subject: [AMRadio] sdr-iq well I am going to stir the pot again with my probable final comments on my SDR-IQ. first the good, never had a panadapter or bandscope, it works great for that. The filters are very good. The issues to me are the following, it is noisy, to itself

Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-03-27 Thread jon baker
brett.gazdzin...@verizon.net Subject: Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net Date: Saturday, March 27, 2010, 8:16 PM Did you try adjusting the rf and IF gain settings? The IF gain adds a lot of noise using spectravue... Also, what

Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-03-27 Thread Rob Atkinson
Hi Bernie, I have gone back and forth on the receive audio question with my rigs. I have never had a PC controlled receiver, but I have a Kenwood TS870 which is a 24 bit dsp firmware receiver. I have the 1000MP Mk V also and I agree that the stock audio is not very good. I widened the stock 6

[AMRadio] SDR-IQ audio

2010-02-14 Thread Bernie Doran
I found the issue, it apparently needed a sound card with more guts, installed a mid range card yesterday ($42) ran the audio through the NBFM plug on the 75A2 so I can flop back and forth. It is now similar with a slight difference due to sloping passband Vs near vertical drop on the sdr.

Re: [AMRadio] SDR-IQ muting

2010-02-11 Thread Bernie Doran
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 10:31 PM Subject: [AMRadio] SDR-IQ muting Anyone using this receiver with a transmitter? If so what's the best way to mute it on transmit? Dick/K5DIC __ Our Main Website

[AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-02-10 Thread Bernie Doran
I purchased an SDR-iQ about five weeks ago and while it performs great in a number of areas it seems to be poor in the audio demodulation, at least on AM, I am getting what sounds like a low level echo and a general artificial quality of sound, my 75A2 sounds much better and that certainly is

Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-02-10 Thread John Coleman
Radio in the Amateur Service Subject: [AMRadio] sdr-iq I purchased an SDR-iQ about five weeks ago and while it performs great in a number of areas it seems to be poor in the audio demodulation, at least on AM, I am getting what sounds like a low level echo and a general artificial quality of sound

Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-02-10 Thread Jay Bromley
.. -- From: Bernie Doran qedconsulta...@embarqmail.com Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 12:02 PM To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net Subject: [AMRadio] sdr-iq I purchased an SDR-iQ about five weeks ago and while

Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-02-10 Thread Bernie Doran
@mailman.qth.net Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 2:17 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq Hey Bernie: This is just a suggestion of what you might check into. I am not familiar with the radio but have heard other brick radios that sound pretty good. Concerning the computer, it is possible

Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-02-10 Thread Bernie Doran
a DVD with good audio. Bernie- Original Message - From: Jay Bromley jayw5...@cox.net To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 4:00 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq Hi Bernie, I am running a Perseus SDR receiver

Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-02-10 Thread Brett Gazdzinski
, 2010 1:02 PM Subject: [AMRadio] sdr-iq I purchased an SDR-iQ about five weeks ago and while it performs great in a number of areas it seems to be poor in the audio demodulation, at least on AM, I am getting what sounds like a low level echo and a general artificial quality of sound, my 75A2

Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-02-10 Thread Jay Bromley
of AM Radio in the Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq Hi Jay. I do have mid to upper range sound card, the processor shows that it is running at about 65 to 80 %, so I assume that is ok. I also notice the latency, about .5 sec and the noise floor does seem

Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-02-10 Thread W5AMI
I've been thinking about getting the SDR-IQ, but I'd like to know more about the other options our there if any of you have opinions. I'd love to team it to my IC-746, but there is no IF output readily available. I have seen something about using some connection to one of the filter slots, but

Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq

2010-02-10 Thread Brett Gazdzinski
, if you want really good performance you have to pay for it. Brett - Original Message - From: W5AMI ars.w5...@gmail.com To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 8:02 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] sdr-iq I've been

[AMRadio] SDR-IQ muting

2010-02-10 Thread Dick Gillespie
Anyone using this receiver with a transmitter? If so what's the best way to mute it on transmit? Dick/K5DIC __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives:

Re: [AMRadio] SDR-IQ muting

2010-02-10 Thread Jay Bromley
Just using a simple relay on the speaker circuit here. 73 de jay/w5jay.. Anyone using this receiver with a transmitter? If so what's the best way to mute it on transmit? Dick/K5DIC __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net