[amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink

2014-01-24 Thread Gabriel - EA6VQ
Many thanks Drew for the suggestion. I will try it. 73. Gabriel - EA6VQ _ Web-Site: HTTP://www.dxmaps.com VQLog 3.1 (build 78): HTTP://www.vqlog.com _ -Mensaje original- De:

[amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink

2014-01-20 Thread g0mrf
into the UHF receiver can be important Thanks David -Original Message- From: Greg D ko6th.g...@gmail.com To: Jim Jerzycke kq...@verizon.net; w4tas w4...@gte.net; 'AMSAT Mailing List' amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 3:47 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz

[amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink

2014-01-20 Thread kc6uqh
, January 20, 2014 1:23 AM To: ko6th.g...@gmail.com; kq...@verizon.net; w4...@gte.net; amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink Hi Greg. Most decent VHF transmitters will already have a pretty good LPF on the output to reduce the harmonics. However

[amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink

2014-01-20 Thread Alan
Of Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 4:06 PM To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink At 07:09 PM 1/19/2014 +, Jim Jerzycke kq...@verizon.net wrote: Buy a diplexer, and connect it as shown in the linked article: http://www.amsat.org

[amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink

2014-01-20 Thread Jim Jerzycke
The original article said it didn't matter, but I put a 50 Ohm load on mine just on General Principles. I HATE seeing a port like that unterminated! 73, Jim KQ6EA On 01/20/2014 10:06 PM, Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL wrote: At 07:09 PM 1/19/2014 +, Jim Jerzycke kq...@verizon.net wrote: Buy a

[amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink

2014-01-20 Thread Greg D
To: ko6th.g...@gmail.com; kq...@verizon.net; w4...@gte.net; amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink Hi Greg. Most decent VHF transmitters will already have a pretty good LPF on the output to reduce the harmonics. However, receivers these days tend

[amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink

2014-01-19 Thread Andrew Glasbrenner
From the old AMSAT website...maybe I'll move it to the new one today: http://www.amsat.org/amsat-new/articles/Mode-J/ 73, Drew KO4MA -Original Message- From: Gabriel - EA6VQ ea...@dxmaps.com Sent: Jan 19, 2014 1:56 PM To: AMSAT-BB@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] 145 MHz signal blocking

[amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink

2014-01-19 Thread Jim Jerzycke
Buy a diplexer, and connect it as shown in the linked article: http://www.amsat.org/amsat-new/articles/Mode-J/ I also tilt both of my Yagis so they're 45* to the boom, which makes them 90* to each other. Yes, I lose some signal on terrestrial use, but ti helped cut the coupling, and

[amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink

2014-01-19 Thread Jim Jerzycke
. This will reduce the third harmonic which is causing your problem. Good luck, -Original Message- From: Jim Jerzycke Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 2:09 PM To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink Buy a diplexer, and connect it as shown

[amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink

2014-01-19 Thread Jim Jerzycke
...@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Jim Jerzycke Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 11:09 AM To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink Buy a diplexer, and connect it as shown in the linked article: http://www.amsat.org/amsat-new/articles/Mode-J/ I also tilt both of my

[amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink

2014-01-19 Thread Greg D
filter on the two meter transmitter. A diplexer will work well for this also. This will reduce the third harmonic which is causing your problem. Good luck, -Original Message- From: Jim Jerzycke Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 2:09 PM To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz

[amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink

2014-01-19 Thread Paul
-Original Message- From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Jim Jerzycke Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 11:09 AM To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink Buy a diplexer, and connect it as shown

[amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink

2014-01-19 Thread Jim Jerzycke
is causing your problem. Good luck, -Original Message- From: Jim Jerzycke Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 2:09 PM To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink Buy a diplexer, and connect it as shown in the linked article: http://www.amsat.org

[amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink

2014-01-19 Thread Greg D
for this also. This will reduce the third harmonic which is causing your problem. Good luck, -Original Message- From: Jim Jerzycke Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 2:09 PM To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink Buy a diplexer, and connect

[amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink

2014-01-19 Thread Jim Jerzycke
. This will reduce the third harmonic which is causing your problem. Good luck, -Original Message- From: Jim Jerzycke Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 2:09 PM To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink Buy a diplexer, and connect it as shown

[amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink

2014-01-19 Thread kc6uqh
Jerzycke; w4tas; 'AMSAT Mailing List' Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 145 MHz signal blocking 435 MHz downlink I know this has been answered before, but I forget. Given one Diplexer, is it better to put it on the Tx side to limit the 3rd harmionic going out, or better on the Rx side to limit the VHF