George,
Assuming that you already loaded the Icom drivers on the PC and
the 2 comm ports show up in your hardware list then setting up SatPC32
should be a breeze, setup-radio-radio1 icom model IC-9100, baud rate
19200, addresses $7C $7C com-port #
the baud rate and addresses are the
6 pin Mini Din connector for the Data 2 port
Stefan, VE4NSA
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Fred Kennedy fr...@kcbbs.gen.nz wrote:
Hi Guys,
Can anyone with an IC-9100 confirm what sort of plug/skt is used
for the Data 2 connection.
I've a 9100 on the way and would like to hook up to
Thanks Stefan. Readily available.
73
Fred
Date sent: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 20:26:13 -0500
Subject:Re: [amsat-bb] Icom 9100 query
From: Stefan Wagener wagen...@gmail.com
To: Fred Kennedy fr...@kcbbs.gen.nz
Copies to: amsat-bb@amsat.org
6 pin Mini Din connector for
Hello Glen,
I tried 3 times to answer to your mail but all my mails were rebounced by the
mail delivery system.
I hope you receive this via AMSAT-BB
73s, Erich, DK1TB
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an
I did notice that the $99,999 remote software - yes, $99,999 - for the
IC-9100 is now marked TBD in the price section I hope someone
fat-fingered that one.
Zack
KD8KSN
-Original Message-
From: John Geiger
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 10:28 AM
To: 'VHF REFLECTOR' ; ICOM
Hi Dee,
Looks a great unit, the preliminary spec is at
http://www.icomuk.co.uk/getFile.asp?categoryID=3508cCID=16907fFID=244
I noted the 1240 MHz band coverage goes out to 1320 MHz, be useful in the UK as
our 23cm band goes out to 1325. The incorporation of a USB port is good, wish
all rigs
On 05/19/2010 03:33 AM, Trevor . wrote:
I noted the 1240 MHz band coverage goes out to 1320 MHz, be useful in the UK
as our 23cm band goes out to 1325. The incorporation of a USB port is good,
wish all rigs had one.
Expanding on the message I wrote directly to Trevor: USB is good, but I
On May 17 2010, Edward R Cole wrote:
At 02:38 PM 5/17/2010, tosca...@umn.edu wrote:
Here's a thought: buy two SoftRocks for a lot less than the price of the
Flex 5000 -- one would be the v6.3Rx/Tx and the other could be the V9 Rx
only.
Huh? Why? Put a xvtr for the uplink band on the Tx and
...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of tosca...@umn.edu
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 12:00 PM
To: Edward R Cole
Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100
On May 17 2010, Edward R Cole wrote:
At 02:38 PM 5/17/2010, tosca...@umn.edu wrote:
Here's a thought: buy
...@umn.edu
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 12:00 PM
To: Edward R Cole
Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100
On May 17 2010, Edward R Cole wrote:
At 02:38 PM 5/17/2010, tosca...@umn.edu wrote:
Here's a thought: buy two SoftRocks for a lot less than the price of
the Flex
On May 16 2010, Sebastian wrote:
Perhaps others such as DEMI, will see this as an opportunity and come up
with alternatives?
Well, keep in mind that DEMI's strength is in transverters, and what is
hard to obtain for satellite operation from most common-place existing
equipment is a
Full duplex transceiver?
Back in the dim dawn of history, there used to be those who constructed
transmitters that were separate from receivers. Although constructing
such a thing is beyond me, I would like to see someone create a device
that was intended to feed the input of an upconverter.
At 02:38 PM 5/17/2010, tosca...@umn.edu wrote:
On May 16 2010, Sebastian wrote:
Perhaps others such as DEMI, will see this as an opportunity and come up
with alternatives?
Well, keep in mind that DEMI's strength is in transverters, and what is
hard to obtain for satellite operation from most
I sold my IC-910H recently, as I had thoughts about going with the 9100. But
at that price, I can't justify it.
I agree that the Flex 5000 is probably a much better radio (since we don't yet
know all the technical details on the 9100). However the cost of the V/U
module for the Flex is about
Watching from the sidelines (with my FT-847 and K3).
One of the reasons I held onto my FT-847 was that with the addition
of my DEMI 144/1296 xvtr the total outlay (when they were new) was
$1600 + $395 ~ $2K. And that covers 160m - 6m, 2m, 70cm, 23cm. The
FT-847 IS a satellite radio,
Yaesu should cash in with a new satellite radio in the $2k price range. It
would likely be a good thing. Almost $4k for the IC-9100 seems a bit
extreme...
73,
Mark N8MH
At 11:50 AM 5/16/2010 -0800, Edward R Cole wrote:
Watching from the sidelines (with my FT-847 and K3).
One of the
George,
I'm not at Dayton, but what O got from a D-Star reflector was $4000 for
bare bones and available sometime Q4.
Dave KB1PVH
Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID
On May 15, 2010 3:31 PM, Gkcarr gkc...@go-express.net wrote:
OK, Dayton folks, what is being said about the Icom IC-9100?
Ridiculous!!!
Michael, W4HIJ
On 5/15/2010 3:43 PM, Dave Webb KB1PVH wrote:
George,
I'm not at Dayton, but what O got from a D-Star reflector was $4000 for
bare bones and available sometime Q4.
Dave KB1PVH
Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID
On May 15, 2010 3:31 PM,
YIKES
bare bones 4k?? If that is the case one would expect it to be a really
hot feature laden rig with everything you'd expect
On May 15, 2010, at 4:17 PM, Michael Tondee wrote:
Ridiculous!!!
Michael, W4HIJ
On 5/15/2010 3:43 PM, Dave Webb KB1PVH wrote:
George,
I'm not at
:
From: myles landstein myles.landst...@gmail.com
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100
To: Michael Tondee mat...@netcommander.com
Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Date: Saturday, May 15, 2010, 4:29 PM
YIKES
bare bones 4k?? If that is the
case one would expect it to be a
really hot feature laden
Buy the 910 now while stocks last then - it obviously make sense!
--
David
KG4ZLB
www.kg4zlb.com
On 5/15/2010 17:44, John Geiger wrote:
Not a bad price at all considering it does true dualband receive. The next
cheapest radio that does true dualband receive is the FTDX5000, and look how
guess like many we were hoping that the spec's might actually be better
then the 'old' old 910 , mainly better uhf/vhf performance /sensitivity
Maybe it does? It's a rig I 'want to like'.
if it has similar spec's and costs more , and you were mostly
interested in the
: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100
Just left Dayton a few hours ago. Icom said that it is basically a 7600 and
a 910. It is bigger than the 910. It was in a display case so I can't tell
you what the feel was like of the weight. Price is in the $4,000.00 range
so that will kill a lot of the satellite market
I guess once I put the upcoming V/U module in my Flex 5000 I'll have
that amount of money in it but I won't have had to spend it all at once
and IMHO I'll have a markedly better radio. Also one that isn't outdated
a day after I walk out of the store with it.
I'm just not a big fan of Icom's
According to IcomAmerica, the IC-9100 is slated for release at the Dayton
Hamvention next year. When it actually becomes available on the US market
is up to the FCC. It is the replacement for the 746 Pro and 910H, hopefully
it won't cost as much as both of them together.
Jeff Moore KE7ACY
--- On Fri, 11/20/09, Jeff Moore tnetcen...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jeff Moore tnetcen...@gmail.com
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100 release date?
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Date: Friday, November 20, 2009, 12:19 PM
According to IcomAmerica, the IC-9100
is slated for release at the Dayton
Hello
I believe it's the IC756 ProIII that has been discontinued not the 746pro
and Is the 9100 actually a Satellite transceiver.
I havent seen any proof of full duplex operation and doppler control
thanks
Howard
VE4ISP
- Original Message -
From: John Geiger aa...@yahoo.com
To:
Although there has been some talk about various models being
discontinued, both the 910 and the756ProII are still very much evident
on the Icom America website!
The 9100 is billed as a satellite transceiver (I mean it does has a
little button on it marked satellite, so it must beyes?) but
--- On Thu, 11/19/09, David - KG4ZLB kg4...@googlemail.com wrote:
From: David - KG4ZLB kg4...@googlemail.com
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100 release date?
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Date: Thursday, November 19, 2009, 9:20 PM
Although there has been some talk
about various models being
29 matches
Mail list logo
