I agree 100%. We just shouldn't do this anymore. We should just offer the
source package and the Windows and Mac binary packages, and the autopackage
for Linux. The packages for the various distros will be done by the distros,
and if the distro doesn't include amsn, some volunteer may also creat
Yes I know that, I never said we were working on the packages for 1 month, I
only said it 'took us' 1 month to
have the packages ready... this isn't the problem of the packages themselves,
but rather our lack of
motivation, if we had one package to do we'd create it in a few seconds and
we're
Hi,
I think you are wrong on this...
The packages didn't take 1 month to be done... It's simply that none of us
cared of doing it...
We tagged the release and... nothing... What made the release to be
published ? Some people made the things moving
Phil
Le Tuesday 11 July 2006 21:23, Youness
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 09:37:42AM +0200, Sander Hoentjen wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 01:30 -0400, Youness Alaoui wrote:
> > Which is why we should stop this whole packages NON-SENS and stop
> > providing ONE binary... (autopackage) instead of a hundred thousands (+
> > it will save us one or
You're right JérômeCourriel: [EMAIL PROTECTED]MSN Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]iChat & AIM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Skype: germinator5000 Le 11 juillet 2006 à 06:57, Boris Faure (aka billiob) a écrit :2 DMGs for MacOSX : one for ppc only (for macosx 10.3.9), and one univ (for macosx 10.4 and above). J,
2006/7/11, Sander Hoentjen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 01:30 -0400, Youness Alaoui wrote:
> > Which is why we should stop this whole packages NON-SENS and stop
> > providing ONE binary... (autopackage) instead of a hundred thousands (+
> > it will save us one or two months of packa
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Russ Kowald wrote:
>
> Vivia Nikolaidou wrote:
> > Hey, Thanx a lot :) I just realized that the Mandriva rpm hasn't been
> > uploaded yet, but the link you gave seems down so I can't fetch it :( Can
> > you upload it somewhere else please? (Preferably directly to
> > ftp:/
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer wrote:
> So as I said to Vivia and Billiob on aMSN, the release was too big,
> it was .dmg.tar.gz, I just re-done the .dmg and now it's a normal
> file size.
>
> I didn't find the previous release on sourceforge so please delete it
> yourself, mine
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 01:30 -0400, Youness Alaoui wrote:
> Which is why we should stop this whole packages NON-SENS and stop
> providing ONE binary... (autopackage) instead of a hundred thousands (+
> it will save us one or two months of packaging... can anyone confirm
> what was the date we fir
