On 10 Jun 2008, at 03:24, Youness Alaoui wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:46:48PM +0100,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 2008/6/7 Thomas Geirhovd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> Not wanting to sound too sceptical here (I like the idea of not
>>> having
>>> to upload skins and plugins manually an
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:46:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 2008/6/7 Thomas Geirhovd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Not wanting to sound too sceptical here (I like the idea of not having
> > to upload skins and plugins manually anymore a lot), but in my
> > experience some of our skin and plu
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestion!
I'm not sure either of the bandwidth requirement for now..
But I know that we use over 500GB/month just providing the
html pages of the website.. so there's a lot of traffic
there...
We'll figure this out on our own, don't worry about it.
There's always a solution! :)
A skin can't really have much of a description... it's a
skin... for plugins, yeah "plugin for amsn" is wrong...
I suppose we could let users modify the description or have
a 'comments' thingy for the skins/plugins... but anyways,
all that will be taken care of when the time comes...
KKRT
On Sat,
2008/6/7 Thomas Geirhovd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Not wanting to sound too sceptical here (I like the idea of not having
> to upload skins and plugins manually anymore a lot), but in my
> experience some of our skin and plugin authors does a poor job of
> describing their own works, often because of
Not wanting to sound too sceptical here (I like the idea of not having
to upload skins and plugins manually anymore a lot), but in my
experience some of our skin and plugin authors does a poor job of
describing their own works, often because of poor skills in english.
Descriptions like "Skin for am
