Philippe Valembois - Phil wrote:
Just compile tcl/tk 8.5 WITHOUT Xft (I mean --disable-xft and not only
removing enable) and you won't get any memleak...
wheepeee, welcome back, crappy fonts :D
-
This SF.net email is
mmh... Are most of u using tcl/tk 8.5 already? Is it stable enough?
On 5/13/07, NoWhereMan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wheepeee, welcome back, crappy fonts :D
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2
Then is useless to use tcl/tk8.5 without XFT support :P
Rafael Rodríguez escribió:
mmh... Are most of u using tcl/tk 8.5 already? Is it stable enough?
On 5/13/07, NoWhereMan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wheepeee, welcome back, crappy fonts :D
mmm.. I just built recently-launched tcl/tk 8.5a6 (well, from
debianized sources via apt-build) and I must recognize it's not a
resource hog anymore. Last time I tried 8.5, it was a full cpu-hog...
I think I'll be using it and see what happens. I don't leave amsn
opened for days, and in the
The only problem with alpha6 (a6) that chameleon does not work. :(
Rafael Rodrguez escribi:
mmm.. I just built recently-launched tcl/tk 8.5a6 (well, from
debianized sources via apt-build) and I must recognize it's not a
resource hog anymore. Last time I tried 8.5, it was a full cpu-hog...
KKRT, take both hands, bring them to your ears and massage thembreath
inbreath out... ;-)
Grz,
Bart
Op Saturday 12 May 2007 04:50:39 schreef Youness Alaoui:
if you want to fucking talk about gnotify memleak, do it here and don't you
dare answer in the wrong thread again!
you know
Ehmm.where was this all aboutI am suffering a memleak myself.. :S
Grz ehh...Bert? Bart? Bram?
Op Saturday 12 May 2007 19:27:45 schreef Youness Alaoui:
didn't work... the memleak is still there... you got another trick/patch?
:p
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 01:14:16PM +0200, Bart Otten
Just compile tcl/tk 8.5 WITHOUT Xft (I mean --disable-xft and not only
removing enable) and you won't get any memleak...
Tcl/Tk team is working on the bug...
Bug is
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=112997aid=1717830group_id=12997
Phil
Bart Otten a écrit :
Ehmm.where was this
