Re: [Amsn-devel] gnotify memleak

2007-05-13 Thread Philippe Valembois - Phil
Memleak is present AT LEAST with a4/a5/a6/HEAD (I didn't test a1/a2/a3 as soon as I discovered it was Xft related...) About HEAD, I hadn't time to test it today but a devel seemed to take care about... Anyway, I think that will be soon fixed... Phil David Girault a écrit : > Hi, > > I use tcl-tk

Re: [Amsn-devel] gnotify memleak

2007-05-13 Thread David Girault
Hi, I use tcl-tk 8.5 beta in gentoo (made a custom ebuild: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173467 ) I not see any problem, but, I share my PC with my wife. So I never leave aMsn running more than 12-15 hours. I'll check my memory next time! Regards, David Rafael Rodríguez a écrit : > mm

Re: [Amsn-devel] gnotify memleak

2007-05-13 Thread Gustavo A. Dí­az
The only problem with alpha6 (a6) that chameleon does not work. :( Rafael Rodríguez escribió: mmm.. I just built recently-launched tcl/tk 8.5a6 (well, from debianized sources via apt-build) and I must recognize it's not a resource hog anymore. Last time I tried 8.5, it was a full cpu-hog...

Re: [Amsn-devel] gnotify memleak

2007-05-13 Thread Rafael Rodríguez
mmm.. I just built recently-launched tcl/tk 8.5a6 (well, from debianized sources via apt-build) and I must recognize it's not a resource hog anymore. Last time I tried 8.5, it was a full cpu-hog... I think I'll be using it and see what happens. I don't leave amsn opened for days, and in the period

Re: [Amsn-devel] gnotify memleak

2007-05-13 Thread NoWhereMan
Rafael Rodríguez wrote: > mmh... Are most of u using tcl/tk 8.5 already? Is it stable enough? well looks like it's not if there's a memleak... btw I think that if you compile using the released source packages (alpha3 o alpha4 IIRC) there shouldn't be problems :/ -

Re: [Amsn-devel] gnotify memleak

2007-05-13 Thread Gustavo A. Dí­az
Then is useless to use tcl/tk8.5 without XFT support :P Rafael Rodríguez escribió: mmh... Are most of u using tcl/tk 8.5 already? Is it stable enough? On 5/13/07, NoWhereMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: wheepeee, welcome back, crappy fonts :D

Re: [Amsn-devel] gnotify memleak

2007-05-13 Thread Rafael Rodríguez
mmh... Are most of u using tcl/tk 8.5 already? Is it stable enough? On 5/13/07, NoWhereMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wheepeee, welcome back, crappy fonts :D - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Expr

Re: [Amsn-devel] gnotify memleak

2007-05-13 Thread NoWhereMan
Philippe Valembois - Phil wrote: > Just compile tcl/tk 8.5 WITHOUT Xft (I mean --disable-xft and not only > removing enable) and you won't get any memleak... wheepeee, welcome back, crappy fonts :D - This SF.net email is spon

Re: [Amsn-devel] gnotify memleak

2007-05-12 Thread Philippe Valembois - Phil
Just compile tcl/tk 8.5 WITHOUT Xft (I mean --disable-xft and not only removing enable) and you won't get any memleak... Tcl/Tk team is working on the bug... Bug is https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112997&aid=1717830&group_id=12997 Phil Bart Otten a écrit : > Ehmm.where was th

Re: [Amsn-devel] gnotify memleak

2007-05-12 Thread Bart Otten
Ehmm.where was this all aboutI am suffering a memleak myself.. :S Grz ehh...Bert? Bart? Bram? Op Saturday 12 May 2007 19:27:45 schreef Youness Alaoui: > didn't work... the memleak is still there... you got another trick/patch? > :p > > On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 01:14:16PM +0200, Bart Ot

Re: [Amsn-devel] gnotify memleak

2007-05-12 Thread Youness Alaoui
didn't work... the memleak is still there... you got another trick/patch? :p On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 01:14:16PM +0200, Bart Otten wrote: > KKRT, take both hands, bring them to your ears and massage thembreath > inbreath out... ;-) > > Grz, > Bart > > Op Saturday 12 May 2007 04:50:39 sch

Re: [Amsn-devel] gnotify memleak

2007-05-12 Thread Bart Otten
KKRT, take both hands, bring them to your ears and massage thembreath inbreath out... ;-) Grz, Bart Op Saturday 12 May 2007 04:50:39 schreef Youness Alaoui: > if you want to fucking talk about gnotify memleak, do it here and don't you > dare answer in the wrong thread again! > you know w