On 04/03/07, Sander Hoentjen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 07:35 -0600, Lee Olson wrote:
> > >From what I can see 'skins/default/desktop-icons/' contains newly
> > designed icons. icons/ contains the older icons that were used for
> > the program. I think icons/ is the corr
On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 07:35 -0600, Lee Olson wrote:
> >From what I can see 'skins/default/desktop-icons/' contains newly
> designed icons. icons/ contains the older icons that were used for
> the program. I think icons/ is the correct place for the program
> icons, as they should not be determi
From what I can see 'skins/default/desktop-icons/' contains newly designed
icons. icons/ contains the older icons that were used for the program. I
think icons/ is the correct place for the program icons, as they should not
be determined by the skin, so we should move the ones from
'skins/def
Ok, so i named them incorrect. The question remains the same:
What benefit do we have to put it under skins?
On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 18:23 -0300, Gustavo A. Díaz wrote:
> Those are Desktop icons in every size... not one only program Icon.
>
> 2007/3/3, Sander Hoentjen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
Those are Desktop icons in every size... not one only program Icon.
2007/3/3, Sander Hoentjen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
Where do the program icons belong? They used to be/are in icons, but now
they are also under skins/default/desktop-icons/. I think we should
choose one, and remove the other l
