Re: Installer support for flatpak

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 9:18 AM Martin Kolman wrote: > > > Just a question what is the expected workflow ? > > That Anaconda on the Atomic Workstation image always installs some > flatpacks from the repo on the ISO and the flatpacks to install are > specified > as a static

Re: Adopting CoreOS Ignition into Fedora+derivatives ecosystem

On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 09:38 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > We're working on merging some of the CoreOS > technologies with > the Fedora/Atomic technologies. One thing that came up is they have > a new take on system bootstrap called Ignition: >

Adopting CoreOS Ignition into Fedora+derivatives ecosystem

We're working on merging some of the CoreOS technologies with the Fedora/Atomic technologies. One thing that came up is they have a new take on system bootstrap called Ignition: https://github.com/coreos/ignition We're investigating making this work in Fedora as well:

Re: Installer support for flatpak

Hello Matthias, Those steps sound reasonable to me. In addition to that (when those pointsbelow will work) it could be nice to support flatpak as a kickstart command. For example to add remote repositories and it even could be interesting having flatpak as Anaconda payload so the %packages

Installer support for flatpak

Hi, I would like to discuss flatpak support for anaconda. The issue comes up in the context of Atomic Workstation and rpm-ostree. Currently, the OS image contains a bunch of preinstalled desktop applications (as rpms). It would make a lot more sense to move to installing all desktop applications