Re: Re[2]: [analog-help] Extended Log File Errors

1998-12-03 Thread Stephen Turner
On Thu, 3 Dec 1998, Aengus Lawlor wrote: One of the advantages of the Extended Log format is that it can be smaller, because it doesn't include redundant information. (The same 10 byes of Date information occur on every single line. It's only 10 bytes per line, but for compact logs,

Re: [analog-help] Extended Log File Errors

1998-12-03 Thread Stephen Turner
The problem here is that the date doesn't appear on every line. Analog requires the date and time (or neither) on every line. If you have one but not the other it should give you a helpful warning message -- doesn't it? I know the date's in the header, but the problem is, what if the date

[analog-help] Extended Log File Errors

1998-12-02 Thread Aengus Lawlor
I just tried to run Analog 3.1 against an Extended Log File from my IIS4 server, and got an error that the LogFormat was incorrect. Not being too familiar with the Extended Log Format, and bearing in mind Stephens comments about Microsofts implementation of Extended Format, I tought I'd do a

Re: [analog-help] Extended Log File Errors

1998-12-02 Thread Jason Linhart
On 12/2/98 6:06 PM Aengus Lawlor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I just tried to run Analog 3.1 against an Extended Log File from my IIS4 server, and got an error that the LogFormat was incorrect. Not being too familiar with the Extended Log Format, and bearing in mind Stephens comments about