Re: [analog-help] Analog And Log File Size

2005-04-13 Thread Jeff Nokes
Yeah, Jeremy Wadsack replied saying something similar. I agree, and after doing some quick Googling, seems it might be due to the ANSI/ISO C Standard (if that's what analog is using for file I/O). "ANSI C requires that fseek and ftell operate with a long int file offset (off_t). On an implemen

Re: [analog-help] Analog And Log File Size

2005-04-13 Thread Stephen Turner
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Jeff Nokes wrote: Just wanted to send a note back saying that splitting the files worked fine. Interesting that analog has a file size barrier when Linux doesn't. Analog does not have any inherent barrier, but you may need to compile it with special options. This is an OS and

Re: [analog-help] error for hostalias regexp

2005-04-13 Thread Jeremy Wadsack
In a regular expressions (perl style) [] is used to signify a character class -- that is a set of characters that can match the pattern. So [96] means match a 9 or a 6. You can use '-' to specify a range of characters, so that [0-9] means any single digit between 0 and 9. In your reg exp, your

[analog-help] error for hostalias regexp

2005-04-13 Thread Derek Sisson
i'm trying to use hostalias regexp to map a range of IP numbers to a value. something like HOSTALIAS REGEXP:^66\.153\.70\.[96-127] mylabel the error i get is c:\logs\analog\analog: Warning C: Bad argument in configuration command: ignoring it: HOSTALIAS REGEXP:^66\.153\.70\.[96-127] mylabe

[analog-help] Excluding log records by 'bytes transferred'

2005-04-13 Thread Connors, Bernie \(ELG/EGL\)
Hello, Can Analog exclude log records based on the number of bytes transferred? I want to exclude insignificant requests that are 140 bytes or less. My users can easily generate thousands of these requests and they are skewing my reports. Here is a sample line from my log file. The v

Re: [MAYBE SPAM] [analog-help] Log file problems - possible doublecounting

2005-04-13 Thread Aengus
On Wednesday, April 13, 2005 11:24 AM [GMT], Chris Sharman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would be nice if analog (or some other tool) could do a more > careful check on 'possible duplicates' - I see the same (from our > demon.co.uk hosted site) - could/has that been done ? It shouldn't be > to

Re: [analog-help] Log file problems - possible double counting

2005-04-13 Thread Aengus
On Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:08 AM [GMT], Andrew Nix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Warning L: logfiles > /logs/webserver/server1/de/http/access.complete.20050215.Z and > /logs/webserver/server1/de/http/access.complete.20050216.Z > overlap: possible double counting > > It seems to b

Re: [MAYBE SPAM] [analog-help] Log file problems - possible double counting

2005-04-13 Thread Chris Sharman
Support for analog web log analyzer wrote: Hello I am running reports on some log files I've been given. They seem sequential and from the same time period but I keep getting the following errors: /usr/local/analog/analog-6.0/analog: Warning D: In Browser Report, SORTBY (pages) doesn't match F

[analog-help] Log file problems - possible double counting

2005-04-13 Thread Andrew Nix
Hello I am running reports on some log files I've been given. They seem sequential and from the same time period but I keep getting the following errors: /usr/local/analog/analog-6.0/analog: Warning D: In Browser Report, SORTBY (pages) doesn't match FLOOR (requests) /usr/local/analog/analog-6