Re: [Analytics] [Wiki-research-l] Identifying bots and bot edit decline

nice, thanks all :) fabian On 11.10.2016, at 12:25, Taha Yasseri > wrote: Hi Fabian, We recently did the same exercise for this paper: Even Good Bots Fight . Have a look at the data collection, where we

Re: [Analytics] Identifying bots and bot edit decline

I wrote about the "Great interwiki migration" in 2015 and you can find the post at https://addshore.com/2015/06/review-of-the-big-interwiki-link-migration/ On 11 October 2016 at 11:08, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: > Wikistats knows about 8017 bot usernames according to >

Re: [Analytics] Identifying bots and bot edit decline

Wikistats knows about 8017 bot usernames according to https://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-ez/wikistats/csv_wp_main.zip (cut -f2 -d, StatisticsBots.csv | sort -u | wc -l ). Given active editors tend to complain a lot if they get counted as bots, a comprehensive list should probably be

[Analytics] Identifying bots and bot edit decline

Hi all , two questions, maybe someone can help: 1. I was trying to compile a complete list of all bots that were ever (potentially) active on the English Wikipedia so that one can identify bot accounts in the dumps. Below are all the lists (including historic bots) that I could find [1].