thanks Murphy,, I got the point what you are saying... In a Single
Android Package, we can use multiple java packages ... Right ?
On Tuesday, August 28, 2012 1:39:42 PM UTC+5:30, karuna vikas wrote:
Hi Everybody ,
I am Creating a application with a multiple functionality
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 8:10 AM, karuna vikas kvk2551...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks Murphy,, I got the point what you are saying... In a Single Android
Package, we can use multiple java packages ... Right ?
You can use 1,000 Java packages within an Android app, if the mood
strikes you, and you
Mark Murphy schrieb:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 8:10 AM, karuna vikas kvk2551...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks Murphy,, I got the point what you are saying... In a Single Android
Package, we can use multiple java packages ... Right ?
You can use 1,000 Java packages within an Android app, if the mood
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Jan Burse janbu...@fastmail.fm wrote:
You can also distribute the 1000 java packages across
multiple APK. Then see to it that these APK share process
ID and user ID. Then one APK can access the other APK
withou getting file read errors.
sharedUserId is not
Mark Murphy schrieb:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Jan Burse janbu...@fastmail.fm wrote:
You can also distribute the 1000 java packages across
multiple APK. Then see to it that these APK share process
ID and user ID. Then one APK can access the other APK
withou getting file read errors.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Jan Burse janbu...@fastmail.fm wrote:
sharedUserId is not recommended for SDK apps.
Not recommended in general or for SDK apps?
My understanding is that sharedUserId was really designed for apps
that ship as part of the firmware.
Why for
SDK apps, you refer
Dianne very strongly recommends that SDK apps do not use it. There are
better ways to get the behavior you want.
Thanks,
Justin Anderson
MagouyaWare Developer
http://sites.google.com/site/magouyaware
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Mark Murphy mmur...@commonsware.comwrote:
On Tue, Aug 28,
Mark Murphy schrieb:
custom signature-level permission
I was googling a little bit and found the following definition:
A permission that the system grants only if the requesting
application is signed with the same certificate as the application that
declared the permission. If the
Jan Burse schrieb:
Mark Murphy schrieb:
custom signature-level permission
I was googling a little bit and found the following definition:
A permission that the system grants only if the requesting
application is signed with the same certificate as the application that
declared the
9 matches
Mail list logo
