Re: [Angstrom-devel] Angstrom Stable Changelog page

2008-09-21 Thread Junqian Gordon Xu
On 09/21/2008 03:54 PM, Dmitry Artamonow wrote: On 05:16 Sun 21 Sep , Junqian Gordon Xu wrote: On 09/20/2008 05:30 AM, Dmitry Artamonow wrote: On 17:36 Wed 17 Sep , Junqian Gordon Xu wrote: [] Good idea, especially in part of package requests for next stable release. I've added leaf

[Angstrom-devel] Does .stable branch updates via monotone?

2008-09-21 Thread Dmitry Artamonow
Playing with .stable branch recently I found that it doesn't updates for me anymore and I don't get recent commits via monotone. Doing mtn pull; mtn update shows this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/OE/org.openembedded.stable $ mtn pull ; mtn update mtn: doing anonymous pull; use -kKEYNAME if you need authen

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Bob Igo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Koen Kooi wrote: > What happens if you follow the current instructions in > http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/building-angstrom ? Is it still > broken? Finally finished building all I could. Building base-image and console-image for the hx4700 wor

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Bernhard Guillon
Bernhard Guillon schrieb: Now, please explain to me why building-angstrom is now duplicated in a wikipage and why the wiki page shouldn't get deleted. Well I got it wrong. I thought you tested the apt-get stuff and found it working fine. I started the wiki page one day before because you

Re: [Angstrom-devel] [RFC] Angstom wiki discussion pages?

2008-09-21 Thread Junqian Gordon Xu
On 09/21/2008 05:05 AM, Bernhard Guillon wrote: Junqian Gordon Xu schrieb: I would suggest use a single page for now for all the discussion just for simplicity. If there is enough demand, we can expand that to every page. I just found out that there is an add on for discussion pages [1] [2

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Bob Igo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dmitry Artamonow wrote: > In fact it would be much nicer not to use "/OE" at all. > We can use something like "${HOME}/OE", so we won't need any > `su` or `chown` anymore. > > Personally I have my OE set up exactly this way. I think that'd be fine, t

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Feed browser and 2008.6 packages

2008-09-21 Thread Junqian Gordon Xu
On 09/21/2008 03:15 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: Bernhard Guillon wrote: Koen Kooi schrieb: Paul Eggleton wrote: Hi there, Would it be possible to restrict the feed browser to released feeds? Currently it is listing packages from 2008.6 as well as 2007.12 and that has already confused one user. It

Re: [Angstrom-devel] monotone db migrate ?

2008-09-21 Thread Javier Grijalba
Hi Thomas, thank you, I did a mtn db migrate --db=OE.mtn afterwards this mtn --db=/OE/OE.mtn pull monotone.openembedded.org org.openembedded.{stable,dev} and now I must wait ... :-) Javier Thomas Kunze schrieb: Javier Grijalba schrieb: Hello, I want to build Angstrom with my OpenSuse 10.3

Re: [Angstrom-devel] fakeroot fetch failed

2008-09-21 Thread Junqian Gordon Xu
On 09/21/2008 07:09 AM, Maurizio Rottin wrote: > i just wanted to point out that version 1.9.6 compiles fine and maybe should be added in the OE packages three. I was not looking for a solution, i was proposing solution ;) 1.9.6 pushed in d2682ccdf4be68f6b1b181b6a06003be2cc4122c fakeroot ad

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Dmitry Artamonow
On 15:50 Sun 21 Sep , Bob Igo wrote: > More tidbits: Ultimately, people should run bitbake as regular users, > but the guide starts out with "mkdir /OE" which will only work via sudo > or otherwise as root. At the risk of someone becoming root and staying > root for the whole setup, why not em

Re: [Angstrom-devel] monotone db migrate ?

2008-09-21 Thread Thomas Kunze
Javier Grijalba schrieb: Hello, I want to build Angstrom with my OpenSuse 10.3 (running in a Vmware). I follow the instructions that are found here http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/building-angstrom 1) I installed monotone rpm -i monotone-0.41-3.1.i586.rpm 2)I want to do linux:/OE # mtn

Re: [Angstrom-devel] 2007.12 r19 images?

2008-09-21 Thread Junqian Gordon Xu
On 09/21/2008 03:37 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: Hi, What would be a good time to bump to r19 and upload them for testing? I guess the opie dudes get to pick the date since they are doing most of the work for 2007.12 nowadays :) blueligthing and I think Sep/29 (before the opie 1.2.4 release, Sep/30)

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Angstrom Stable Changelog page

2008-09-21 Thread Dmitry Artamonow
On 05:16 Sun 21 Sep , Junqian Gordon Xu wrote: > On 09/20/2008 05:30 AM, Dmitry Artamonow wrote: >> On 17:36 Wed 17 Sep , Junqian Gordon Xu wrote: [] >> Good idea, especially in part of package requests for next stable >> release. I've added leafpad to list of tested programs - I'm using

[Angstrom-devel] 2007.12 r19 images?

2008-09-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Hi, What would be a good time to bump to r19 and upload them for testing? I guess the opie dudes get to pick the date since they are doing most of the work for 2007.12 nowadays :) regards, Koen ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-dist

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Feed browser and 2008.6 packages

2008-09-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Bernhard Guillon wrote: Koen Kooi schrieb: Paul Eggleton wrote: Hi there, Would it be possible to restrict the feed browser to released feeds? Currently it is listing packages from 2008.6 as well as 2007.12 and that has already confused one user. It lists the feeds in which the package is pr

[Angstrom-devel] monotone db migrate ?

2008-09-21 Thread Javier Grijalba
Hello, I want to build Angstrom with my OpenSuse 10.3 (running in a Vmware). I follow the instructions that are found here http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/building-angstrom 1) I installed monotone rpm -i monotone-0.41-3.1.i586.rpm 2)I want to do linux:/OE # mtn --db=OE.mtn pull monotone.

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Feed browser and 2008.6 packages

2008-09-21 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Sunday 21 September 2008, Koen Kooi wrote: > It lists the feeds in which the package is present, so I don't see a > reason not to include the feeds. Especially considering people are > actively using 2008.x images. Ah right, I wasn't aware of that. Cheers, Paul ___

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Feed browser and 2008.6 packages

2008-09-21 Thread Bernhard Guillon
Koen Kooi schrieb: Paul Eggleton wrote: Hi there, Would it be possible to restrict the feed browser to released feeds? Currently it is listing packages from 2008.6 as well as 2007.12 and that has already confused one user. It lists the feeds in which the package is present, so I don't see

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Bob Igo wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Some other notes: The "source-me.txt" contents aren't indented properly. Syntactically, it's fine, but it might lead people to believe that "PATH=/OE/bitbake-1.8.10/bin:${ORG_PATH}" and below should actually be nested. It's also not

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Feed browser and 2008.6 packages

2008-09-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Paul Eggleton wrote: Hi there, Would it be possible to restrict the feed browser to released feeds? Currently it is listing packages from 2008.6 as well as 2007.12 and that has already confused one user. It lists the feeds in which the package is present, so I don't see a reason not to includ

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Members of the Angstrom team

2008-09-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 21 sep 2008, om 21:48 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven: On Sunday 21 September 2008, Koen Kooi wrote: Actually, autobuilders are the gatekeepers for the feeds. If you add something to the build-feeds.sh script the autobuilder will build and upload it. A cronjob at the server runs

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Bob Igo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 More tidbits: Ultimately, people should run bitbake as regular users, but the guide starts out with "mkdir /OE" which will only work via sudo or otherwise as root. At the risk of someone becoming root and staying root for the whole setup, why not emph

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Members of the Angstrom team

2008-09-21 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Sunday 21 September 2008, Koen Kooi wrote: > Actually, autobuilders are the gatekeepers for the feeds. If you add > something to the build-feeds.sh script the autobuilder will build and > upload it. A cronjob at the server runs the sorting script every 4 hours. > You can of course instruct autob

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Bob Igo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Some other notes: The "source-me.txt" contents aren't indented properly. Syntactically, it's fine, but it might lead people to believe that "PATH=/OE/bitbake-1.8.10/bin:${ORG_PATH}" and below should actually be nested. It's also not possible to copy

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Angstrom Wiki navigation

2008-09-21 Thread Bernhard Guillon
Junqian Gordon Xu schrieb: Most people (including me) are too unfamiliar with moin-moin wiki to fiddle with it. But people with skills should feel free to change the style of the angstrom wiki. Unfortunate I am also unfamiliar with moin-moin wiki this is also one of the reasons I ask here a

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Members of the Angstrom team

2008-09-21 Thread Bernhard Guillon
Thomas Kunze schrieb: Hi everybody, I was wondering who is a member of the angstom team? Koen only? Anyone with commit access to oe who wants to be an angstrom member? Who thinks himself as a member atm? I'm asking because its not clear to me who has a vote on various issues like documentat

[Angstrom-devel] Feed browser and 2008.6 packages

2008-09-21 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi there, Would it be possible to restrict the feed browser to released feeds? Currently it is listing packages from 2008.6 as well as 2007.12 and that has already confused one user. Cheers, Paul ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Bernhard Guillon
Thomas Kunze schrieb: Right. But imo it should be enough to have sth. like "set up oe as in [oe-getting-started] and set distro to angstrom". If sth. is wrong with the oe getting started page this should be fixed. No need to duplicate stuff here. The apt stuff is already in oe wiki and as long

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Initramfs masterplan proposal

2008-09-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Thomas Kunze wrote: Yuri Bushmelev schrieb: 2) Add support for your device to initramfs-kexecboot_1.0.bb by supplying appropriate FBANGLE and INPUTDEV AFAIK thesing considering to call kexecboot binary as init. So FBANGLE/INPUTDEV should be detected somewhere inside kexecboot. E.g. from /proc

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Bernhard Guillon
Koen Kooi schrieb: That won't work. Unsupported stuff has no place in documentation. If it doesn't work, it should be tracked down why it doesn't work and get fixed. I just set up another buildmachine following the instructions to the letter, and it worked. Ok, I started a temporary testing p

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Bob Igo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Koen Kooi wrote: > Indeed there is. Fixed! Thanks for spotting it. It works on my machine > because that those have both a 1.8.8 and 1.8.10 dir No problem :) These are exactly the types of things I'd like to discover. - -- Bob Igo StormLogic ---

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Bob Igo wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Koen Kooi wrote: Bob Igo wrote: Koen Kooi wrote: I appreciate you telling me that, but shouldn't the official build instructions be corrected to show a consistent version? They already have been :) Nearly :) I see that you upd

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Bob Igo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Koen Kooi wrote: > Bob Igo wrote: > Koen Kooi wrote: > I appreciate you telling me that, but shouldn't the official build > instructions be corrected to show a consistent version? > >> They already have been :) Nearly :) I see that you updated the

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Bob Igo wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Koen Kooi wrote: Either should be fine. I appreciate you telling me that, but shouldn't the official build instructions be corrected to show a consistent version? They already have been :) - -- Bob Igo StormLogic -BEGIN PGP

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Bob Igo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Koen Kooi wrote: >> Either should be fine. I appreciate you telling me that, but shouldn't the official build instructions be corrected to show a consistent version? - -- Bob Igo StormLogic -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Lin

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Bob Igo wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Koen Kooi wrote: What happens if you follow the current instructions in http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/building-angstrom ? I'm still installing Ubuntu on my spare machine, but in the meantime I already noticed a problem with t

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Bob Igo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Koen Kooi wrote: > What happens if you follow the current instructions in > http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/building-angstrom ? I'm still installing Ubuntu on my spare machine, but in the meantime I already noticed a problem with the instructions

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Bob Igo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Koen Kooi wrote: > To avoid confusion: Angstrom will never support a deb/rpm/whatever based > setup method. There's an overhaul scheduled for the angstrom > distrofiles, which will alter the way how various options are selected. > So people using makef

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Bob Igo wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Koen Kooi wrote: I guess I was unclear when I said: Unsupported stuff has no place in documentation. That means: Unsupported stuff does NOT get mentioned in the documentation. A solution to this would be to support the DEB-based

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Initramfs masterplan proposal

2008-09-21 Thread Thomas Kunze
Yuri Bushmelev schrieb: 2) Add support for your device to initramfs-kexecboot_1.0.bb by supplying appropriate FBANGLE and INPUTDEV AFAIK thesing considering to call kexecboot binary as init. So FBANGLE/INPUTDEV should be detected somewhere inside kexecboot. E.g. from /proc and /sys

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Bob Igo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Koen Kooi wrote: > I guess I was unclear when I said: > > Unsupported stuff has no place in documentation. > > That means: > > Unsupported stuff does NOT get mentioned in the documentation. A solution to this would be to support the DEB-based build

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Thomas Kunze
Koen Kooi schrieb: Bernhard Guillon wrote: Koen Kooi schrieb: Bernhard Guillon wrote: Bob Igo schrieb: In my experience, the unofficial apt-gettable OE build instructions were 99% simpler, and 100% painless, when compared with the official build instructions: http://blog.leggewie.org/?p=39 It

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Initramfs masterplan proposal

2008-09-21 Thread Yuri Bushmelev
> 2) Add support for your device to initramfs-kexecboot_1.0.bb by > supplying appropriate FBANGLE and INPUTDEV AFAIK thesing considering to call kexecboot binary as init. So FBANGLE/INPUTDEV should be detected somewhere inside kexecboot. E.g. from /proc and /sys > 3) Test the resulting kexe

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Bernhard Guillon wrote: Koen Kooi schrieb: Bernhard Guillon wrote: Bob Igo schrieb: In my experience, the unofficial apt-gettable OE build instructions were 99% simpler, and 100% painless, when compared with the official build instructions: http://blog.leggewie.org/?p=39 It's the only way I've

Re: [Angstrom-devel] X/Qt and Zaurus rotation with Opie

2008-09-21 Thread Bernhard Guillon
Paul Eggleton schrieb: On Sunday 21 September 2008, you wrote: Thinking outside the box for a moment: you could use qvfb[1] inside an X11 session to run opie or opie apps. Actually that's a great idea, perhaps someone could test it? Yes nice idea! I can try it out but not today.

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Bernhard Guillon
Koen Kooi schrieb: Bernhard Guillon wrote: Bob Igo schrieb: In my experience, the unofficial apt-gettable OE build instructions were 99% simpler, and 100% painless, when compared with the official build instructions: http://blog.leggewie.org/?p=39 It's the only way I've been able to build Angs

[Angstrom-devel] Initramfs masterplan proposal

2008-09-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Hi, Interest in initramfs images that make booting from different media easier has picked up lately, so let's come up with a masterplan to streamline development a bit. Background: Angstrom supports devices that have a relatively small internal storage capacity making it hard for the end-us

Re: [Angstrom-devel] X/Qt and Zaurus rotation with Opie

2008-09-21 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Sunday 21 September 2008, you wrote: > Thinking outside the box for a moment: you could use qvfb[1] inside an > X11 session to run opie or opie apps. Actually that's a great idea, perhaps someone could test it? Cheers, Paul ___ Angstrom-distro-devel

Re: [Angstrom-devel] X/Qt and Zaurus rotation with Opie

2008-09-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Bernhard Guillon wrote: Hi, I now read the source of X/Qt a bit to debug its behaviour on my SIMpad (screen resolution is switched). It is a hack for Zaurus and there are some ifdefs for it. I was not able to use it without QWS (the hacks for zaurus) at the moment but I keep trying. So I am wond

Re: [Angstrom-devel] X/Qt and Zaurus rotation with Opie

2008-09-21 Thread Junqian Gordon Xu
On 09/21/2008 05:28 AM, Bernhard Guillon wrote: Junqian Gordon Xu schrieb: The rotation is probably for different Z models (clamshell vs portrait). Could you post or point to the code? Here is the source http://cvs.sourceforge.jp/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/xqt/xqt2/xfree86/xqt-driver/qtscreen.cc

Re: [Angstrom-devel] X/Qt and Zaurus rotation with Opie

2008-09-21 Thread Bernhard Guillon
Junqian Gordon Xu schrieb: The rotation is probably for different Z models (clamshell vs portrait). Could you post or point to the code? Here is the source http://cvs.sourceforge.jp/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/xqt/xqt2/xfree86/xqt-driver/qtscreen.cc?rev=1.1&view=auto best regard Bernhard Guillon

Re: [Angstrom-devel] [RFC] Angstom wiki discussion pages?

2008-09-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Bernhard Guillon wrote: Junqian Gordon Xu schrieb: I would suggest use a single page for now for all the discussion just for simplicity. If there is enough demand, we can expand that to every page. I just found out that there is an add on for discussion pages [1] [2] :) But this add on also

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Angstrom Stable Changelog page

2008-09-21 Thread Junqian Gordon Xu
On 09/20/2008 05:30 AM, Dmitry Artamonow wrote: On 17:36 Wed 17 Sep , Junqian Gordon Xu wrote: I've sketched a stable branch changelog page [1] to help with release announcement and anxious users. Backporters: please add couple of lines after you commit a change to the stable branch. It's o

Re: [Angstrom-devel] [RFC] Angstom wiki discussion pages?

2008-09-21 Thread Bernhard Guillon
Junqian Gordon Xu schrieb: I would suggest use a single page for now for all the discussion just for simplicity. If there is enough demand, we can expand that to every page. I just found out that there is an add on for discussion pages [1] [2] :) But this add on also changes the syntax fro

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Members of the Angstrom team

2008-09-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Junqian Gordon Xu wrote: On 09/20/2008 11:42 AM, Thomas Kunze wrote: Hi everybody, I was wondering who is a member of the angstom team? Koen only? Anyone with commit access to oe who wants to be an angstrom member? Who thinks himself as a member atm? I'm asking because its not clear to me who

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Why is Angstroms documentation spread over wiki and the webpage?

2008-09-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Bernhard Guillon wrote: Bob Igo schrieb: In my experience, the unofficial apt-gettable OE build instructions were 99% simpler, and 100% painless, when compared with the official build instructions: http://blog.leggewie.org/?p=39 It's the only way I've been able to build Angstrom. This is a nice

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Angstrom Wiki navigation

2008-09-21 Thread Junqian Gordon Xu
On 09/20/2008 06:04 AM, Bernhard Guillon wrote: Hi all, we need to discuss about the navigation of the Angstrom Wiki. I did a quick hack to gain something like a navigation here [1] and added it in this form #Include navigation from another page to ease the maintenance of navigation on the w

Re: [Angstrom-devel] X/Qt and Zaurus rotation with Opie

2008-09-21 Thread Junqian Gordon Xu
On 09/20/2008 06:41 AM, Bernhard Guillon wrote: Hi, I now read the source of X/Qt a bit to debug its behaviour on my SIMpad (screen resolution is switched). It is a hack for Zaurus and there are some ifdefs for it. I was not able to use it without QWS (the hacks for zaurus) at the moment but I

Re: [Angstrom-devel] How do I build the latest?

2008-09-21 Thread Junqian Gordon Xu
On 09/21/2008 02:53 AM, Alessandro Pellizzari wrote: Il giorno dom, 21/09/2008 alle 02.07 -0500, Junqian Gordon Xu ha scritto: On 09/20/2008 05:39 AM, Alessandro Pellizzari wrote: sudo apt-get install gcc-3.4 (at least in Debian lenny) as qemu needs gcc3 to compile. I only had gcc4 installe

Re: [Angstrom-devel] How do I build the latest?

2008-09-21 Thread Alessandro Pellizzari
Il giorno dom, 21/09/2008 alle 02.07 -0500, Junqian Gordon Xu ha scritto: > On 09/20/2008 05:39 AM, Alessandro Pellizzari wrote: > > sudo apt-get install gcc-3.4 (at least in Debian lenny) > > > > as qemu needs gcc3 to compile. I only had gcc4 installed. > > That's no longer needed as we backpo

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Members of the Angstrom team

2008-09-21 Thread Junqian Gordon Xu
On 09/20/2008 11:42 AM, Thomas Kunze wrote: Hi everybody, I was wondering who is a member of the angstom team? Koen only? Anyone with commit access to oe who wants to be an angstrom member? Who thinks himself as a member atm? I'm asking because its not clear to me who has a vote on various i

Re: [Angstrom-devel] How do I build the latest?

2008-09-21 Thread Junqian Gordon Xu
On 09/20/2008 05:39 AM, Alessandro Pellizzari wrote: Il giorno gio, 18/09/2008 alle 21.32 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: I'm going through this learning process myself right now and I've attached my own cheat sheet. Spoiler alert: I haven't succeeded in building a working ROM image yet.