Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
overruled with superiority-ridden and unparriable responses like it's
visually appealing,
Well, if you think a terminal is visually appealing, thats fine for you,
every commercial foo has it
This is the truth.
and most Linux
developers in the world come from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorn Potter wrote:
What I mean is there is no reason to ever reply in a rude way. I guess
the way I am using the word terse is more as slang for being rude or
disrespectful.
- From http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/terse
1. neatly or
Hello Michael,
Sunday, December 30, 2007, 1:36:10 AM, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorn Potter wrote:
What I mean is there is no reason to ever reply in a rude way. I guess
the way I am using the word terse is more as slang for being rude or
disrespectful.
[TOFU alert]
+1 From me, Lorn. Very well said.
Am Freitag, den 28.12.2007, 09:43 +1000 schrieb Lorn Potter:
Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
As for welcoming feeling,
I'm not sure someone can easily point us to similar project to learn
from, I'm afraid.
other linux embedded
Am Freitag, den 28.12.2007, 12:40 +0200 schrieb Paul Sokolovsky:
Hello Matthias,
Friday, December 28, 2007, 12:49:38 AM, you wrote:
While pulling a Godwin was not the brightest of his ideas, his
original complaint is valid. It is not a troll but yet another angered
user...
A user
Hello Matthias,
Friday, December 28, 2007, 3:19:43 PM, you wrote:
Am Freitag, den 28.12.2007, 12:40 +0200 schrieb Paul Sokolovsky:
Hello Matthias,
Friday, December 28, 2007, 12:49:38 AM, you wrote:
While pulling a Godwin was not the brightest of his ideas, his
original complaint is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
Hello Matthias,
The response made him look like an idiot, way to go folks!
That's how you see the situation, Matthias, fix your perception,
please!
Since you seem to be of the mistaken view only Matthias has such a
Am Freitag, den 28.12.2007, 15:41 +0200 schrieb Paul Sokolovsky:
Hello Matthias,
Friday, December 28, 2007, 3:19:43 PM, you wrote:
My entire point was to notify you that he had every right to be angered
due to the response he received. Funny how you completely ignore that,
isn't it?
On 28/12/2007, Matthias Hentges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
angstrom-devel. It was pretty obvious that he was a simple _user_ with
unknown amount of Linux experience (no offense intended, Aaron).
I'm told it's no use apologising to him on-list as someone unsubscribed him
p.s. I'm unsubscribing from devel too; I'm not able to make a massive
contribution due to lack of time - I've only just begun setting up for
developing. I *might* hang around on the angstrom users list.
___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
Hello Lorn,
Friday, December 28, 2007, 1:43:28 AM, you wrote:
Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
As for welcoming feeling,
I'm not sure someone can easily point us to similar project to learn
from, I'm afraid.
other linux embedded build/distribution communities:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorn Potter schreef:
Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
An embedded linux disto _is_ device specific.
Join us in 21th century, Lorn, it all changes now ;-).
Right, as soon as you can run something compiled for collie on openmoko,
I will then believe
Hello Koen,
Saturday, December 29, 2007, 12:09:26 AM, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorn Potter schreef:
Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
An embedded linux disto _is_ device specific.
Join us in 21th century, Lorn, it all changes now ;-).
Right, as soon as you can
Hello Paul,
This went without response, but it contains some interesting
points which are worth discussion, so I'd like to make some comments.
Note: no flame is intended!
Sunday, December 23, 2007, 2:02:40 AM, you wrote:
Graeme Gregory wrote:
I personally don't feel that this lends a
On 27/12/2007, Koen Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Diab schreef:
snip drivel
the Angstrom Gestapo
And I hereby invoke Godwin's law[1].
You'd be better off simply ignoring trolls - by responding and trading
insults you can only reduce yourself to their level and thereby demean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Graeme Gregory schreef:
All those issues are however likely not because embedded people are
bad, but because the area is complex, and there's lack of critical
mass in the community - even to handle fluent communication. Many
projects respond to
Am Donnerstag, den 27.12.2007, 21:50 + schrieb Paul M:
On 27/12/2007, Koen Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Diab schreef:
snip drivel
the Angstrom Gestapo
And I hereby invoke Godwin's law[1].
You'd be better off simply ignoring trolls - by responding and trading
insults
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aaron Diab schreef:
snip drivel
the Angstrom Gestapo
And I hereby invoke Godwin's law[1].
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
- --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] will go go away in december 2007, please
use [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead.
-BEGIN
Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
As for welcoming feeling,
I'm not sure someone can easily point us to similar project to learn
from, I'm afraid.
other linux embedded build/distribution communities:
uClibc, T2, ptxdist, and probably even gumstix. I am sure there are others.
All those issues
On Dec 22, 2007 3:08 PM, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
_Please_ try to act much more diplomatic, in word and deed. If you're angry,
swallow it down, think a day about it, and formulate a professional
statement. Don't haste. It's very important.
One thing I have found to be
Graeme Gregory wrote:
Guys the bickering in bugzilla is getting to the point where it
is silly.
I personally don't feel that this lends a good impression of the OE
project and the Angstrom distribution.
Also a lot of the actual arguments belong on the mailing list or private
emails. People
21 matches
Mail list logo
