Re: [Anima] Review of draft-ietf-anima-grasp-09

2017-03-03 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 04/03/2017 13:28, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Charlie Perkins wrote: > > I probably should have said more. I just meant that such nodes ought > to be > > allowed to have some network interfaces that do not participate in > GRASP. > > Please

Re: [Anima] Review of draft-ietf-anima-grasp-09

2017-03-03 Thread Michael Richardson
Charlie Perkins wrote: > I probably should have said more. I just meant that such nodes ought to be > allowed to have some network interfaces that do not participate in GRASP. > Please excuse the unclear brevity of my remark. Yes. generally, GRASP

[Anima] anima - Requested sessions have been scheduled for IETF 98

2017-03-03 Thread "IETF Secretariat"
Dear Sheng Jiang, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the scheduled session information followed by the original request. anima Session 1 (2:00:00) Monday, Afternoon Session I 1300-1500 Room Name: Zurich A size: 115

Re: [Anima] Review of draft-ietf-anima-grasp-09

2017-03-03 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 04/03/2017 10:07, Charlie Perkins wrote: > Hello Brian, > > I probably should have said more. I just meant that such nodes ought to > be allowed to have some network interfaces that do not participate in > GRASP. Please excuse the unclear brevity of my remark. No problem. This was a gap

Re: [Anima] Review of draft-ietf-anima-grasp-09

2017-03-03 Thread Charlie Perkins
Hello Brian, I probably should have said more. I just meant that such nodes ought to be allowed to have some network interfaces that do not participate in GRASP. Please excuse the unclear brevity of my remark. Regards, Charlie P. On 3/1/2017 5:25 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: Hi Charlie,