Re: [Anima] [lamps] lamps(/anima): another struggle related to CSR attr, draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs-01 and draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm

> I don't think that the IETF hasn't defined any CA/Registrar protocols, > other than the BRSKI drafts. > I'm curious about what part of RFC8995 makes you think that there is a > CA/Registrar protocol included I should have written "some of the current BRSKI drafts."

Re: [Anima] ANIMA@IETF116: Call for agenda items

Hi, topics that I guess I'm the hook for: 1) rfc8366bis: summary of the wrapping up of YANG [3 min + 10 min questions] 2) plans for interop testing going forward from IETF116 [5min] 3) masa and registrar considerations documents [5 minutes each] -- Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT

Re: [Anima] [lamps] lamps(/anima): another struggle related to CSR attr, draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs-01 and draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm

Salz, Rich wrote: > I don't think that the IETF hasn't defined any CA/Registrar protocols, > other than the BRSKI drafts. I'm curious about what part of RFC8995 makes you think that there is a CA/Registrar protocol included... we would have liked to do this, but we haven't. > It

Re: [Anima] ANIMA@IETF116: Call for agenda items

Hi Toerless, and one for BRSKI-AE: Topic/Title Update on BRSKI-AE: WGLC Name of Presenter(s) David von Oheimb Length of time requested 10 min Draft name draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae We're going to submit version 04 around end of next

Re: [Anima] ANIMA@IETF116: Call for agenda items

Hi Toerless, Two requests for the agenda: Topic/Title Status Update on JWS Voucher Name of Presenter(s)Steffen Fries Length of time requested5-7 min Draft name: draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-06 (or later),