-- Forwarded message -
From:
Date: ter, 13 de fev de 2018 23:12
Subject: [nmrg] RFC 8316 on Autonomic Networking Use Case for Distributed
Detection of Service Level Agreement (SLA) Violations
To: , , <
Dear All.
It seems that we have the same "author information" as RFC 8321. I had
understood reading a previous email that this was not possible.
Thus, I suggest to maintain our current configuration (Michael as Editor
and everybody else as authors) and wait for the IESG review.
Best.
Jéferson
Em
Dear Anima.
I am also a co-author of this draft and I think it is in a good shape to
advance. Besides that, I believe the publication of the reference model is
an important step for the WG.
Best.
Jéferson
Em ter, 9 de jan de 2018 às 19:32, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>
Dear ANIMA.
I read and support the adoption of this document.
Best.
Jéferson
Em qui, 7 de dez de 2017 07:07, Michael H. Behringer <
michael.h.behrin...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> I also support the adoption of this document.
>
> Michael
>
> On 29/11/2017 6:35 AM, Sheng Jiang wrote:
> > During the
Hi Michael.
I think the security section looks good, but I have some comments, to
clarify some passages
My comments:
In Section 9:
"... transit, inject and replay packets "on the wire". In an insider
attack, the attacker has access to an autonomic node, or can insert
packets directly into
Hi.
The current wording in draft-du-anima-an-intent is "ANIMA Intent Policy".
This sounds a little repetitive, but it highlights the problematic nature
of intent in ANIMA.
I'm not sure if only parameters can be enough, but it is also depends on
the definition of "parameters"... Maybe some form of