On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 04:23:08PM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Pedro,
Hi,
> > For instance, disaster recovery scenarios require to establish
> > network systems (virtual and physical) that should be autonomic and
> > disconnected from any previously centralized infrastructure.
>
> Yes, we
see inline
Pedro Martinez-Julia writes:
>> To: anima@ietf.org
>> Subject: [Anima] Autonomic Registry
>>
>> Dear WG members,
>>
>> According to the presentation in the NMRG session, the ANIMA model relies
>> in a registry whic
Pedro,
> For instance, disaster recovery scenarios require to establish network
> systems (virtual and physical) that should be autonomic and disconnected
> from any previously centralized infrastructure.
Yes, we have already understood this problem, but there's a trade-off
between this and
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:50:51AM +0100, Laurent Ciavaglia wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
> Without the will to throw buzzwords to the list, but there are works on
> block-chain that may be relevant to consider.
IMHO, the block-chain mechanisms fits well with autonomic control and
management. I will try
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:40:38AM +, Michael Behringer (mbehring) wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
Hi,
> Generically, ANIMA devices get a domain certificate. Today,
> practically all certificate management solutions are centralised, with
> a central CA, and several RAs (Registration Authorities). So for
...
-Original Message-
From: Anima [mailto:anima-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pedro Martinez-
Julia
Sent: 15 November 2016 11:30
To: anima@ietf.org
Subject: [Anima] Autonomic Registry
Dear WG members,
According to the presentation in the NMRG session, the ANIMA model relies
in a registry which seems
Hi Pedro,
Thanks for your feedback and follow-up! Appreciated! Inline...
> -Original Message-
> From: Anima [mailto:anima-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pedro Martinez-
> Julia
> Sent: 15 November 2016 11:30
> To: anima@ietf.org
> Subject: [Anima] Autonomic Registry
&g