Re: [Anima] how should join proxy react to multiple registrars

2023-01-11 Thread Esko Dijk
.g. prefer the one with longest TTL, or one that worked before (for a JP implementation that can monitor which "sessions" went well or which not.) Esko -Original Message- From: Anima On Behalf Of Michael Richardson Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2023 20:36 To: Brian E Carpenter ; anima@ietf

Re: [Anima] how should join proxy react to multiple registrars

2023-01-04 Thread Michael Richardson
Brian E Carpenter wrote: > M_FLOOD includes a TTL. > "The message MUST contain a time-to-live (ttl) for the validity of the > contents, given as a positive integer value in milliseconds. There is > no default; zero indicates an indefinite lifetime." Sure, so after that time,

Re: [Anima] how should join proxy react to multiple registrars

2023-01-03 Thread Brian E Carpenter
M_FLOOD includes a TTL. "The message MUST contain a time-to-live (ttl) for the validity of the contents, given as a positive integer value in milliseconds. There is no default; zero indicates an indefinite lifetime." In any case, floods must be ignored after their TTL expires, obviously. I see

[Anima] how should join proxy react to multiple registrars

2023-01-03 Thread Michael Richardson
I've opened ticket: https://github.com/anima-wg/constrained-voucher/issues/260 Assume that a Join Proxy is receiving GRASP M_FLOOD messages on it's uplink (ACP) side. What should it do when it receives announcements from multiple Registrars (distinct v6 locators). Where does it connect to?