Re: [Anima] Shepherd review draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-09

Comments on section 5, 6 and 7. > -- > Section 5.4 > a) See comment for section 2.4.4 for where i think the first paragraph > description should be. There isn't a 2.4.4, so I'm not really sure I understand

[Anima] dns-sd [was Shepherd review draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-09]

On one point only: On 27/03/2018 08:11, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > d) Add section to request brksi-proxy and brski-registrar to > > IANA service name registry. > > I'm still not sure I understand the why of dns-sd discovery in an ANI > environment. That's a discussion on its

Re: [Anima] Shepherd review draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-09

Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I definitely recommend replacing lower-case "may" in a case like > the one below. Agreed. > Perhaps: >>> , and MUST NOT be >>> enabled unless the JRC indicates support for them Changed. -- Michael Richardson

Re: [Anima] dns-sd [was Shepherd review draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-09]

On 27/03/2018 10:47, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > On 27/03/2018 08:11, Michael Richardson wrote: > > ... > >> > >> > d) Add section to request brksi-proxy and brski-registrar to > >> > IANA service name registry. >

Re: [Anima] Shepherd review draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-09

Final comments/actions on Toerless' awesome review. The -13 is coming out soon, but we have 13 issues to resolve still. > - > Section 8) > a) First paragraph: Unvailable MASA is not a security but an >

Re: [Anima] dns-sd [was Shepherd review draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-09]

Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 27/03/2018 08:11, Michael Richardson wrote: > ... >> >> > d) Add section to request brksi-proxy and brski-registrar to >> > IANA service name registry. >> >> I'm still not sure I understand the why of dns-sd

Re: [Anima] I-D Action: draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-13.txt

So, page 21 says: > ... This provides an > earliest date which is reasonable. Call this the current > reasonable date (CRD). This value SHOULD NOT be stored in any > way, and applies to the current Registration attempt only. > Subsequent attempts MUST follow this proceedure