On 27/03/2018 10:47, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 27/03/2018 08:11, Michael Richardson wrote:
> > ...
> >>
> >> > d) Add section to request brksi-proxy and brski-registrar to
> >> > IANA service name registry.
> >>
> >> I'm still not sure I understand the why of dns-sd discovery in an ANI
> >> environment.
>
> > That's a discussion on its own and I think it should be kept separate.
>
> Good, I think so as well.
>
> > So I would leave these registrations aside for now; nobody else
> > is going to ask for brksi-* service names, so there's no urgency.
>
> > Once this phase is done, I hope we can discuss
> > draft-eckert-anima-grasp-dnssd
> > properly in the WG, and the deeper implications.
>
> I'm not sure what to do about the current statements in the appendix then.
I really can't judge whether that material is sufficiently
baked to be normative text (even under a MAY). I do have
sympathy with making BRSKI usable more generally, but I'm
not competent to judge whether this text is ready for the
standards track.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
