I strongly agree with the proposed change.
Bill Atwood
On 15/05/2017 4:30 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Hi Anima WG (only),
>
> We need to resolve this issue quickly, to get a new draft out in the next
> few days, before the IESG meeting next week.
>
> So, since I haven't seen any opinions o
Hi Anima WG (only),
We need to resolve this issue quickly, to get a new draft out in the next
few days, before the IESG meeting next week.
So, since I haven't seen any opinions on the issue below, I propose to
delete the UDP paragraph as suggested below. Note that this does not
prevent us adding
Sheng Jiang wrote:
> Hi, authors of draft-ietf-anima-voucher,
> I am doing a thorough review as the document shepherd with my ANIMA
okay. We'll work through these on Tuesday (tomorrow).
> A few DISCUSS & EDNOTE from editor notes should be removed.
Well, they are there to keep us
Hi, authors of draft-ietf-anima-voucher,
I am doing a thorough review as the document shepherd with my ANIMA chair hat
on. Please address the below comments so that we could process this document
further. I cannot claim myself a security expert, so extra security expert
review is needed, either
