Hi,
A few comments on this too. Again, it is a good topic to explore.
1. What's the relationship to draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity?
2. I am a bit confused by section 5.1. There is no such GRASP
message as M_NEG_SYN. Are you proposing a negotiation objective
or a synchronization objective?
Hi,
A quick comment since I will not be in Prague. This draft opens an
important topic. At least we should explore it in more depth.
One comment is that specifying how GRASP unicast messages would work
over UDP is not quite simple - that's why it isn't covered in the
main GRASP spec. Ensuring tha
OK, I'm getting there. More in line:
On 13/07/2017 03:57, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> >> Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Is the
> >> following correct?
> >>
> >> > Topology (ASCII art):
> >>
> >> Topology is essentially correct. As you point out,
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Is the
>> following correct?
>>
>> > Topology (ASCII art):
>>
>> Topology is essentially correct. As you point out, RFC7217 is the
>> recommendation going forward, so having a a big IEEE OUI allocation
>> isn
