Esko Dijk wrote:
> It could also be named +josejson or +jose-json then ? Not as nice as
> +jws but at least more relatable to the original media type name.
It seems like less of a good idea, but I'm not opposed to it.
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
This draft might change those requirements, it could use more reviews:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mediaman-suffixes/
I personally think we should not assume every structured suffix will also
be a registered sub type.
I think we should:
1. Move the normative statements to a
Update to my previous email: as I learnt now the registration of a +suffix in
the SSS registry doesn't require that the registered name is an existing media
type name. (Example: +der)
So +jws could be registered with the registration fields pointing to RFC 7515
"application/jose+json" as the
