Duly noted.
At this point I think we'll wait for direction from the AD. I expect
other points will come up from the IESG.
Regards
Brian
On 03/05/2017 14:32, Martin Thomson wrote:
> You seem to have covered the other points well enough. I won't say
> that I'm happy with the security story; I
(IETF list removed from CCs. Nothing secret here, it just seems
unnecessary to fill several thousand inboxes with this...)
Thanks for the review, Martin. Responses below:
On 02/05/2017 14:39, Martin Thomson wrote:
> Reviewer: Martin Thomson
> Review result: Not Ready
>
> This document describes
Reviewer: Martin Thomson
Review result: Not Ready
This document describes a generic protocol that is for doing just
about anything and run over just about any transport protocol. Within
that remit, the document is coherent and though I agree with Barry
about unnecessary verbiage, it seems to
