Is the attached drawing correct? It's supposed to be an Autonomic Function
implemented across three Autonomic Nodes X, Y and Z containing a total of
four ASAs managing two different technical objectives A and B.
(If anyone wants to fire back a corrected version I have attached the PPT
as well as
Laurent, the text in section 3 of your document is informative.
I am left confused about what are the actual definitions of and
relationships between an AF (Autonomic Function) and an ASA (Autonomic
Service Agent)? The definition Michael pointed at and the conversation
on the list seem quite
Just blending the two response sub-threads:
On 12/07/2016 00:37, Laurent Ciavaglia wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> Yes. There's been an assumption, I think, that one "autonomic function" ==
>> one ASA.
>> We need to be clear if that is an axiom, and we need to think about how ASAs
>> are
>> named, and if
> -Original Message-
> From: Anima [mailto:anima-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E
> Carpenter
> Sent: 09 July 2016 12:39
> To: Laurent Ciavaglia <laurent.ciavag...@nokia-bell-labs.com>; anima
> <anima@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [Anima] Fwd: New Versio
Hi,
Thanks for this. One point raises some questions in my mind:
> 5. Intent splitting (on each node): Intent is split into sections,
> one for the ANI itself, others for specific Autonomic Functions.
> ASAs are notified if there is new Intent for them. Some intent
> sections
Dear ANIMA WG,
FYI: a new version of the I-D has been posted.
The main update is the addition of a section on Intent Life Cycle based
on the initial text provided by Michael Behringer
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/rk2CgO62nmXFuKOBX-Gtb5v0p5E).
Michael is now also co-author of
