Re: [Anima] I-D Action: draft-liu-anima-grasp-distribution-06.txt

2018-07-11 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi, I haven't had time to carefully read sections 1-5, but I think their general message is fine. Here are some first comments on section 6, the proposed GRASP extensions: >In fragmentary CDDL, a Un-solicited Synchronization message follows >the pattern: > >

Re: [Anima] I-D Action: draft-liu-anima-grasp-distribution-06.txt

2018-07-11 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi Bing, Responses in line: On 12/07/2018 15:58, Liubing (Leo) wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Thanks for your comments! Since this new version proposed some protocol > extensions, we really need review from GRASP perspective. Please see reply > inline. > >> -Original Message- >> From: Anima

Re: [Anima] I-D Action: draft-liu-anima-grasp-distribution-06.txt

2018-07-11 Thread Liubing (Leo)
Hi Brian, Thanks for your comments! Since this new version proposed some protocol extensions, we really need review from GRASP perspective. Please see reply inline. > -Original Message- > From: Anima [mailto:anima-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter > Sent: Thursday, July