to like the result if that happens, neither the government nor ripe nor
> its membership.
>
> --srs
>
> __
> From: anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Carlos
> Friaças via anti-abuse-w
El mié, 09-09-2020 a las 08:52 +0200, Alessandro Vesely escribió:
> On Tue 08/Sep/2020 16:33:20 +0200 Alex de Joode wrote:
> > A webform, for a regulator, most likely will be seen as an
> > 'upgrade'. Note that FB and Google also *only accept* complaints,
> > notices etc via webforms. So one can
On Tue 08/Sep/2020 16:33:20 +0200 Alex de Joode wrote:
A webform, for a regulator, most likely will be seen as an 'upgrade'. Note that
FB and Google also *only accept* complaints, notices etc via webforms. So one
can argue a webform is abuse@ 2.0 :) So I do not share you view that a webform
_
> From: anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Carlos
Friaças via anti-abuse-wg
>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 4:44:26 PM
> To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
> Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Report & Co-Chair
anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Carlos
Friaças via anti-abuse-wg
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 4:44:26 PM
To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Report & Co-Chair's Decision on Proposal 2019-04
Hi,
I would like to second Piotr's comment. Thank you for your
e result
if that happens,
neither the government nor ripe nor its membership.
>
--srs
From: anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Carlos
Friaças via anti-abuse-wg
>
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 4:44:26 PM
>
To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
>
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Report &
..@consulintel.es>>
Sent: Tuesday 8 September 2020 09:20
To: Brian Nisbet mailto:brian.nis...@heanet.ie>>;
anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net<mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net>
mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net>>
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Report & Co-Chair's Decision on Proposal 20
membership.
--srs
From: anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Carlos
Friaças via anti-abuse-wg
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 4:44:26 PM
To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Report & Co-Chair's Decision on Proposal 2019-04
Hi,
I would like to se
eptember 2020 09:20
> *To:* Brian Nisbet ; anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net <
> anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Report & Co-Chair's Decision on Proposal
> 2019-04
>
>
> CAUTION[External]: This email originated from outside of the
> organisation. Do not
__
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Sent: Tuesday 8 September 2020 08:58
To: Brian Nisbet ; anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Report & Co-Chair's Decision on Proposal 2019-04
CAUTION[External]: This email originated from outside of the organisation. Do
no
75301. CRA No. 20036270
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Sent: Tuesday 8 September 2020 08:58
To: Brian Nisbet ; anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Report & Co-Chair's Decision on Proposal 2019-04
CAUTION[External]: This email originated from outside of the organisation. Do
not
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Sent: Tuesday 8 September 2020 08:58
To: Brian Nisbet ; anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Report & Co-Chair's Decision on Proposal 2019-04
CAUTION[External]: This email originated from outside of the organisation. Do
not click on links or
in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270
From: anti-abuse-wg on behalf of JJS JJS
Sent: Tuesday 8 September 2020 00:31
To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Report & Co-Chair's Decision on Proposal 2019-04
CAUTION[External]: This email originated
> If I didn't know that you expected me to offer support for this
> proposal, neither did anyone else.
i, for one, did. it's standard procedure under the pdp.
and assuming no one else understands what you do not understand is an
interesting mis-understanding.
randy
FSC, Dublin D01 X8N7, Ireland
>
> +35316609040 brian.nis...@heanet.ie www.heanet.ie
>
> Registered in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270
> --
> *From:* anti-abuse-wg on behalf of JJS
> JJS
> *Sent:* Monday 7 September 2020 16:27
> *To:* a
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:19:27PM +, Brian Nisbet wrote:
Brian, Alireza, Tobias,
> A few weeks ago we reached the end of the latest review phase for 2019-04.
> The Co-Chairs have worked closely with the NCC Policy Development Office
> since then to try to make a decision on this policy.
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 01:27:14AM +1000, JJS JJS wrote:
> That fact that you classify my email as being on the "no" argument, shows
> how misguided you are.
>
> Not for one second was I against this proposal, just the point about
> mandating emails.
>
> There is no consensus "against" this
, Ireland
+35316609040 brian.nis...@heanet.ie www.heanet.ie
Registered in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270
From: anti-abuse-wg on behalf of JJS JJS
Sent: Monday 7 September 2020 16:27
To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Report &
in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270
From: anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Suresh
Ramasubramanian
Sent: Monday 7 September 2020 16:32
To: JJS JJS ; anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Report & Co-Chair's Decision on Proposal 2019-04
CAU
A bit too late to the party but I was in support, I am sorry I wasn’t clear
--srs
From: anti-abuse-wg on behalf of JJS JJS
Sent: Monday, September 7, 2020 8:57:14 PM
To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Report & Co-Chair's Deci
That fact that you classify my email as being on the "no" argument, shows
how misguided you are.
Not for one second was I against this proposal, just the point about
mandating emails.
There is no consensus "against" this proposal.
Your methodology of surveying views is so warped, it is
Colleagues,
A few weeks ago we reached the end of the latest review phase for 2019-04. The
Co-Chairs have worked closely with the NCC Policy Development Office since then
to try to make a decision on this policy. This email contains a report on the
Discussion Phase and Review Phase and then a
22 matches
Mail list logo
