Re: [AOLSERVER] new AOL-based thread-happy mem allocator in 8.4

2002-04-23 Thread Zoran Vasiljevic
On Tuesday 23 April 2002 08:00, you wrote: I have finally commited the improved memory allocator from the AOLServer Tcl mods to the 8.4 branch. Hey, I call this *very* good news ! This may also be the point to reconsider improving the AOLserver's way of dealing with Tcl-only extensions and

Re: [AOLSERVER] new AOL-based thread-happy mem allocator in 8.4

2002-04-23 Thread Jeffrey Hobbs
On Tuesday 23 April 2002 08:00, you wrote: I have finally commited the improved memory allocator from the AOLServer Tcl mods to the 8.4 branch. ... This may also be the point to reconsider improving the AOLserver's way of dealing with Tcl-only extensions and copyiny command-sets

Re: [AOLSERVER] new AOL-based thread-happy mem allocator in 8.4

2002-04-23 Thread Zoran Vasiljevic
On Tuesday 23 April 2002 09:37, you wrote: AFAIK, what I commited takes care of all the known patches that AOLServer had against the Tcl core. I believe you should be able to use the AOLServer head with the Tcl core head without any mods to the Tcl core, or any funny bugs and the like.

[AOLSERVER] Oracle connections going defunct

2002-04-23 Thread Janine Sisk
Hi all, Remember my emergency a few weeks ago where we moved an nsd 2.3.3 site onto Redhat 7.2 and it blew up on me? We did a hasty upgrade to nsd 3.3+ad13 and it's running much better now, with one glaring exception - over time, connections to Oracle start dying: oracle 674 670 1 11:29

Re: [AOLSERVER] Oracle connections going defunct

2002-04-23 Thread C. R. Oldham
The Oracle driver is version 2.6, according to it's version.h. Janine, Don't know if this is very helpful, but we do not see this behavior. Our site doesn't do many LOBs or large files though. What version of the Oracle client and server are you on? -- C. R. Oldham, Director of Technology

Re: [AOLSERVER] Oracle connections going defunct

2002-04-23 Thread Janine Sisk
On 4/23/02 12:19 PM, C. R. Oldham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What version of the Oracle client and server are you on? Good point, CR, that would be useful info wouldn't it! The Oracle version is 8.1.7.3 (the .3 coming from an Oracle patchset). janine -- Janine Sisk President/CEO furfly.net,

Re: [AOLSERVER] Oracle connections going defunct

2002-04-23 Thread Janine Sisk
Unfortunately I already have the MaxOpen/MaxIdle workaround in place, which I believe is what you're talking about. janine On 4/23/02 12:41 PM, Barry Books [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have not run on Linux in a while but when I did I remember having to set the database handle timeout to a

Re: [AOLSERVER] Building on HP-UX 11.00

2002-04-23 Thread Kriston Rehberg
I've tried to get this working but failed before running out of interest. It has something to do with the redefinition of the word signal and possibly other conflicting header files. It doesn't work on HP/UX 10.20 either. Kris On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 16:45:12 +1000, COLLINS Patrick [EMAIL

Re: [AOLSERVER] malformed bucket chain in Tcl_DeleteHashEntry

2002-04-23 Thread Kriston Rehberg
For me, the number of projects I have to deal with which still us ns_share is heinous. I just wish there were a drop-in replacement but there just isn't. Kris On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:41:49 +0100, Harry Moreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 22 Apr, Michael A. Cleverly wrote: On Thu, 18 Apr 2002,

Re: [AOLSERVER] Oracle connections going defunct

2002-04-23 Thread Andrew Piskorski
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 09:26:14AM -0700, C. R. Oldham wrote: Data point--probably not very helpful. Our production Oracle install is 8.1.6.2, but we have a dev box running 8.1.7.2. Neither show any defunct processes. All our aolservers connect over Net8/tcp and use MTS. CR, just

Re: [AOLSERVER] Oracle connections going defunct

2002-04-23 Thread Rob Mayoff
+-- On Apr 23, Barry Books said: I have not run on Linux in a while but when I did I remember having to set the database handle timeout to a very large number otherwise I had this problem. I think there is a bug in the database driver on Linux since I don't have this problem on

Re: [AOLSERVER] Itanium and AOLserver

2002-04-23 Thread Kriston Rehberg
I had been playing around with an Itanium Linux system in the Source Forge Compile Farm but it's been so long ago and I can't remember the hostname for the system anymore. I didn't think that the gcc compiler was 64-bit aware on Itanium (just like it is not 64-bit aware on Solaris SPARC,

Re: [AOLSERVER] Oracle connections going defunct

2002-04-23 Thread C. R. Oldham
CR, just wondering, why do you use MTS? Any particular reason? I just recalled, too, that I think InterMedia needs it for some reason... -- C. R. Oldham, Director of Technology NCA CASI Arizona State University [EMAIL PROTECTED] V:480-965-8703 F:480-965-9423

Re: [AOLSERVER] Oracle connections going defunct

2002-04-23 Thread Janine Sisk
On 4/23/02 1:30 PM, Rob Mayoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Janine, I assume you've looked in your bdump, cdump, and udump directories for evidence. Yep - nothing whatsoever of interest. Is the defunct process a child of nsd? Yes, it is. There are only a couple of defuncts right now (I've got

[AOLSERVER] [ aolserver-Support Requests-547787 ] problems with ssl cert

2002-04-23 Thread Ms. Source Forge
Support Requests item #547787, was opened at 2002-04-23 21:09 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=203152aid=547787group_id=3152 Category: Configuration: Other Group: aolserver2_x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: wiki wa (wikiwa)

[AOLSERVER] [ aolserver-Support Requests-547781 ] parsing symlinks as adps

2002-04-23 Thread Ms. Source Forge
Support Requests item #547781, was opened at 2002-04-23 16:56 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=203152aid=547781group_id=3152 Category: Configuration: Other Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alan C. Hines (alanhines)