Are the weekly chats officially dead? I know Nate is extraordinarily
busy right now (well, aren't we all) but we could still get on the chat
every week or every other week without him.
Of course, it helps to have something to talk about and something worth
talking about ... so why don't I throw
- What's your single biggest gripe about AOLserver? If you
could haveone thing changed or fixed, what would it be?
I discovered this in the last few days. If I instant message
someone a URL pointing to an image, it never gets logged in the
access log. Perhaps it's something to do with
On 2003.07.31, Daniel P. Stasinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- What's your single biggest gripe about AOLserver? If you
could haveone thing changed or fixed, what would it be?
I discovered this in the last few days. If I instant message
someone a URL pointing to an image, it never gets
- Original Message -
From: Dossy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:44 PM
Subject: [AOLSERVER] Are the weekly chats officially dead?
Are the weekly chats officially dead? I know Nate is extraordinarily
busy right now (well, aren't we all) but we
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:44:12PM -0400, Dossy wrote:
Are the weekly chats officially dead? I know Nate is extraordinarily
busy right now (well, aren't we all) but we could still get on the chat
every week or every other week without him.
Indeed!
Of course, it helps to have something to
You mean when they click on the URL in the IM they receive
and the browser goes to fetch the image, the nsd/nslog never
logs the HTTP request?
Correct.
Is this reproducible? Always? For any image, or specific
images, or image types? Is it dependent on the recipient of
the IM?
I
I am glad to hear someone is working on Debian packages, as I am getting
ready to install Aolserver on a Debian server.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 02:53:36PM -0600, Roberto Mello wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:44:12PM -0400, Dossy wrote:
Are the weekly chats officially dead? I know Nate is
Roberto Mello wrote:
- An SQLite driver (hopefully I'll get that working soon).
This one is actually tricky. In order to use SQLite in production
enviroment, you need to catch SQLITE_SCHEMA errors and reeval the query.
If you want to experiment, here's my beta driver -
+-- On Jul 31, Roberto Mello said:
| - Readline support for nscp.
You could just get a better client program. For example, connecting to
nscp from inside Emacs can give you editing and history support.
If you have a separate program that puts readline on top of a TCP
connection, you can
+-- On Jul 31, Daniel P. Stasinski said:
| I have pasted URL's in AIM and on irc, and also typed in the
| specific url into the url box on IE 6 and Linux/Mozilla and in
| each case it was not logged.
Capture the entire HTTP request that isn't logged, using tcpdump -s
2000 -w tcpdump.out
On Friday, August 1, 2003, at 07:54 AM, Rob Mayoff wrote:
+-- On Jul 31, Roberto Mello said:
| - Readline support for nscp.
You could just get a better client program. For example, connecting to
nscp from inside Emacs can give you editing and history support.
If you have a separate
On 2003.07.31, Roberto Mello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- What's your single biggest gripe about AOLserver? If you could have
one thing changed or fixed, what would it be?
- Readline support for nscp.
Lately, I've been thinking of switching to tclsh as my login shell (yes,
I'm a nut) and
On 2003.07.31, Wojciech Kocjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It works faster than nsmysql, at least for me... The main problem is
date/time/datetime... Yuck.
Not to get all defensive, but are you saying the nssqlite driver is
faster than the nsmysql driver, or that SQLite is faster than MySQL for
Lately, I've been thinking of switching to tclsh as
my login shell (yes,
I'm a nut) and I've heard from other folks that
they'd like readline
support in nscp ... so, I wonder ... what might it
take for something
like package require readline to work. So, if you
really want
readline
On 2003.07.31, Patrick Spence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Dossy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- What's your single biggest gripe about AOLserver? If you could have
one thing changed or fixed, what would it be?
There ya go, limiting it to ONE thing.. :) but I am difficult, and never
listen
On 2003.07.31, Brett Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is already a tclreadline binding.
http://tclreadline.sourceforge.net
It'd be great except TclReadlineCmd calls Tcl_CreateFileHandler(0, ...)
for stdin. If you could pass it the input and output fd's, that'd be
perfect ...
Maybe I'll
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Dossy wrote:
2: full emulation of mod_rewrite and .htaccess files
I know this isn't what you want to hear, but ... if you want Apache,
then run Apache. :-)
I'm in strong agreement. There's a lot in .htaccess that's fundamental
Apache architecture (AddHandler in a
Dossy said:
1: A better solution for virtual hosting
a: I don't have to run multiple instances of aolserver
b: the Pageroot variable is updated correctly so scripting
in languages like php can handle virtual hosting
c: logging to seperate files for each virtual server
Peter M. Jansson said:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Dossy wrote:
2: full emulation of mod_rewrite and .htaccess files
I know this isn't what you want to hear, but ... if you want Apache,
then run Apache. :-)
I'm in strong agreement. There's a lot in .htaccess that's fundamental
Apache
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Patrick Spence wrote:
Using filters is easy enough, I did it when I ran AS.. but I am running
some third party stuff that is made more capable/powerful with mod_rewrite
and .htaccess... and some other software that requires .htaccess so it
makes it easier to work with...
In a message dated 7/31/03 8:28:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah, I don't think we really need full readline/ncurses in nscp. I
think just line editing capabilities (cursor forward, backwards, start
of line, end of line) would be a big win at this point.
Considering how "standard" VT100
In a message dated 7/31/03 8:30:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm in strong agreement. There's a lot in .htaccess that's fundamental
Apache architecture (AddHandler in a .htaccess file, for example -- that
just won't work with AOLserver as it stands, and the changes would go a
long way
Peter M. Jansson said:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Patrick Spence wrote:
Using filters is easy enough, I did it when I ran AS.. but I am running
some third party stuff that is made more capable/powerful with
mod_rewrite
and .htaccess... and some other software that requires .htaccess so it
makes
Dossy wrote:
On 2003.07.31, Wojciech Kocjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It works faster than nsmysql, at least for me... The main problem is
date/time/datetime... Yuck.
Not to get all defensive, but are you saying the nssqlite driver is
faster than the nsmysql driver, or that SQLite is faster than
Roberto Mello wrote:
- Readline support for nscp.
That would be quite hard, since readline also has to guess the terminal
type and so on.
Wouldn't it be much better to write nscp client in Tcl+readline or even
Tk. I have a pretty generic ztelnet module, which I use to connect.
It's pretty old and
25 matches
Mail list logo
