On 2004.08.19, Wojciech Kocjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For returning files, you can always work the way [fcopy] does - leave
> the fp open and when the socket is writable, read some more and send it.
>
> This wouldn't be too resource consuming. I've never seen too many HTML
> files above 100K
Jim Wilcoxson wrote:
IMO it is not scalable to use connection servicing threads to spool
output when the size of the output exceeds the socket buffer capacity.
Doing I/O with non-blocking, event-driven threads also helps prevent
DOS attacks. The trade-off is in memory usage: when a connection
serv
After the recent discussions, I felt it may be useful to codify what I
see as the current CVS commit guidelines for project developers. The
current text is up on the wiki:
http://panoptic.com/wiki/aolserver/CVSCommitGuidelines
I make reference to a "Vision Statement" which I am still in the
On 2004.08.18, Michael Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 18, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Chris Davies wrote:
>
> > expected behavior yes.
> >
> > Actual behavior, no
> >
> > telnet aol.com 80
>
> That would be because you're going to a redirect farm, not the actual
> site.
>
> Try www.aol.com.
Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 18, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Chris Davies wrote:
expected behavior yes.
Actual behavior, no
telnet aol.com 80
That would be because you're going to a redirect farm, not the actual
site.
Try www.aol.com.
- --
Michael Matthews, [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCAFTP
expected behavior yes.
Actual behavior, no
telnet aol.com 80
Trying 205.188.145.213...
Connected to aolr-v1.evip.aol.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
HEAD / HTTP/1.0
HTTP/1.0 404 Not Found
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:04:18 GMT
Server: AOLserver/3.4.2
Content-Type: text/html
Content
On Aug 18, 2004, at 1:09 PM, Chris Davies wrote:
It seems that a HEAD request is still processed by OpenACS, and even
though it is a HEAD request, it does set up a session and set a cookie.
As an FYI, the HTTP RFC basically states that servers should do all the
processing on a HEAD request that wou
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 09:22 -0400, Janine Sisk wrote:
> Based on suggestions here, I set minthreads to 10 and threadtimeout to
> 3600. Maxthreads was already set to 10, so I left it alone.
You mention OpenACS -- I had a server that got bogged down tremendously
the other day when it got hit with a
> > figure out where Google's robots live. That's why I was suggesting
> > that the dispatching algorithm needs to be a registered proc.
>
> Perhaps it could be both.
Yeah, that would be nice. No doubt many people would want to group
just by URL, and that would solve several of the cases I raise
On Wednesday 18 August 2004 16:43, Robert Seeger wrote:
> Given the current movement of this thread in the direction of "You're
> wrong... no, you are!!", I figured I'd toss something out in an attempt
> to set it back on track a bit.
>
> What, exactly, is the goal that we are trying to accomplish
...
> > AOLserver is ideally suited to the majority of server tasks. About the
> > only shortcoming which comes to mind is that conn threads are required
> > to do blocking writes. But fixing that would be of benefit to the HTTP
> > processing side too.
>
> So, we want reader threads and separate
On 2004.08.18, Jim Wilcoxson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi - To put spiders in a separate thread pool, mapping requests to
> thread pools by url doesn't work. You have to map by regular
> expression on the User-Agent header or by IP address, assuming you can
> figure out where Google's robots li
On 2004.08.18, Janine Sisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 18, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
>
> >What class of hardware are these sites running on? maxthreads=10 is
> >pretty low, IMHO. Running one site on a 1.2 GHz P3 running Linux, I'd
> >comfortably set minthreads=maxthreads=30.
maxconnections should be high, like 100. This is the number of
keepalive socket connections your server maintains. These are low
overhead, and make it faster for active browsers to get pages from you
site since they don't have to reconnect. We use a keepalive timeout
of 15 (seconds). That means
Given the current movement of this thread in the direction of "You're
wrong... no, you are!!", I figured I'd toss something out in an attempt
to set it back on track a bit.
What, exactly, is the goal that we are trying to accomplish by applying
one of these patches? Can we put together a list of g
Hi - a few suggestions/ideas:
1. How many requests per second do you average, and what are your
burst rates like? What are your vmstat numbers like during average
and burst request processing, and how do they compare to when your
system is lightly loaded? Getting familiar with these numbers will
On Aug 18, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
What class of hardware are these sites running on? maxthreads=10 is
pretty low, IMHO. Running one site on a 1.2 GHz P3 running Linux, I'd
comfortably set minthreads=maxthreads=30.
BTW, what's the guidelines on setting maxconnections? Should it b
Hi - To put spiders in a separate thread pool, mapping requests to
thread pools by url doesn't work. You have to map by regular
expression on the User-Agent header or by IP address, assuming you can
figure out where Google's robots live. That's why I was suggesting
that the dispatching algorithm
On Aug 18, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
What class of hardware are these sites running on? maxthreads=10 is
pretty low, IMHO. Running one site on a 1.2 GHz P3 running Linux, I'd
comfortably set minthreads=maxthreads=30.
Dual 733 MHz P3s, old Dell server running Linux.
I can (and will)
On 2004.08.18, Janine Sisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To add a bit more data to the fire, here is the config section I was
> using for nsopenssl with AOLserver 4. it is basically straight out of
> the latest version of the OpenACS suggested config file.
>
> The *.pem files do exist; I believe I
On 2004.08.18, Janine Sisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To refresh everyone's memory, I have a situation where a couple of
> older ACS sites on the same system, running nsd3.3+ad13, started
> hanging multiple times per day. Most of the time by the time I receive
> notification from uptime, the pro
Hello Dossy,
On Aug 18, 2004, at 20:56, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
ns_param CertFile server/server.crt
ns_param KeyFile server/server.pem
Do these two certificate files exist? In the server log at start-up,
does it say it was able to load these okay? If it can't load them, t
To refresh everyone's memory, I have a situation where a couple of
older ACS sites on the same system, running nsd3.3+ad13, started
hanging multiple times per day. Most of the time by the time I receive
notification from uptime, the problem has passed and leaves no clue
behind. Sometimes I do man
To add a bit more data to the fire, here is the config section I was
using for nsopenssl with AOLserver 4. it is basically straight out of
the latest version of the OpenACS suggested config file.
The *.pem files do exist; I believe I changed the client cert section
to point to the same files as t
On 2004.08.18, Bruno Mattarollo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have been following quite closely the discussion about nsopenssl 3.0
> beta and AOLServer 4 and after several weeks of working with nsopenssl
> 3.0 beta 18, AOLServer 4.0.5, OpenSSL 0.9.7d I saw this in the error
> logs (when I put de
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 22:25, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
> No, we should NOT apply EITHER of these two multi-protocol patches,
>
> BECAUSE ... the entire driver model is being reworked for 4.1. Can
> the same functionality be implemented against 4.1 without getting in
> the way of the re
> a. YES, I like AS to be more powerful multiprotocol
> server instead of being a powerful http-server only.
> And, I like proposal X better than Y because of Z.
I vote for (a).
I read both discussions from the sourceforge-links you provided and I
see no "jealousness" or "vanity" betw
Hello,
I have been following quite closely the discussion about nsopenssl 3.0
beta and AOLServer 4 and after several weeks of working with nsopenssl
3.0 beta 18, AOLServer 4.0.5, OpenSSL 0.9.7d I saw this in the error
logs (when I put debug to "true" in my nsd.tcl)
[18/Aug/2004:16:57:38][805.251873
28 matches
Mail list logo
