The main argument for github is that it supports a public collaborative usage
of git.
Unless we hear otherwise, so far I think we can summarize this thread as:
Tom strongly dislikes github.
Several other people favor it.
The rest don't care or haven't spoken up yet.
I personally think github
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Jade Rubick jrub...@truist.com wrote:
The main argument for github is that it supports a public collaborative
usage of git.
Unless we hear otherwise, so far I think we can summarize this thread as:
Tom strongly dislikes github.
Several other people favor it.
Jade Rubick wrote:
Unless we hear otherwise, so far I think we can summarize this thread as:
Tom strongly dislikes github.
Several other people favor it.
The rest don't care or haven't spoken up yet.
I'll toss in my 2 cents. For my recent projects I've begun to use
fossil. It has a
Not sure if it meets your distributed wiki requirements but technically any
wiki attached to a github project can be used as a git repository itself,
making it distributed and version controlled like your code.
https://github.com/blog/699-making-github-more-open-git-backed-wikis
is a more
