[AOLSERVER] recent updates

2011-10-19 Thread Jeff Rogers
Hey all, me again. For those of you who don't monitor the commits list I wanted to share a few changes I've recently made as well as a few I'm still thinking about. - implemented native decoding of strings in ns_returnfile. This allows filenames that are not utf-8 to be passed, similar to

[AOLSERVER] Fwd: AOL Listserv to be Discontinued

2011-10-19 Thread Dossy Shiobara
Everyone, It appears that AOL is going to be shutting own its LISTSERV, which includes several AOLserver mailing lists. Since there's still activity on this mailing list, I think it would be worth moving to a new list. SourceForge offers GNU Mailman lists as part of its project hosting

Re: [AOLSERVER] Fwd: AOL Listserv to be Discontinued

2011-10-19 Thread Jeff Rogers
Sourceforge seems a reasonable choice to me. -J Dossy Shiobara wrote: Everyone, It appears that AOL is going to be shutting own its LISTSERV, which includes several AOLserver mailing lists. Since there's still activity on this mailing list, I think it would be worth moving to a new list.

Re: [AOLSERVER] recent updates

2011-10-19 Thread Fenton, Brian
Hi Jeff congrats on all the great work. That all sounds super. A new AOLserver release would be amazing, but maybe seeing as 4.0 was first released 8 years ago, we could consider that it's about time for a move to 5.0? Not wanting to get too Firefox-y about it, but I think it would be good for

Re: [AOLSERVER] recent updates

2011-10-19 Thread Brett Schwarz
Hey Jeff, I'm about to start using aolserver for the first time in many, many years, so your post is very encouraging, and the changes look good. Your exposed the gzip flag to tcl scripts (ns_conn gzip) item reminded me that I believe I had promised some code a while back on that...and I

Re: [AOLSERVER] recent updates

2011-10-19 Thread Andrew Piskorski
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 05:09:48PM +0100, Fenton, Brian wrote: A new AOLserver release would be amazing, but maybe seeing as 4.0 was first released 8 years ago, we could consider that it's about time for a move to 5.0? I guess he should just bump the version number up to 9.0 then, that'd look

Re: [AOLSERVER] recent updates

2011-10-19 Thread Rusty Brooks
On Oct 19, 2011, at 6:51 PM, Andrew Piskorski wrote: On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 05:09:48PM +0100, Fenton, Brian wrote: A new AOLserver release would be amazing, but maybe seeing as 4.0 was first released 8 years ago, we could consider that it's about time for a move to 5.0? I guess he

Re: [AOLSERVER] recent updates

2011-10-19 Thread Jeff Rogers
Fenton, Brian wrote: Hi Jeff congrats on all the great work. That all sounds super. A new AOLserver release would be amazing, but maybe seeing as 4.0 was first released 8 years ago, we could consider that it's about time for a move to 5.0? Not wanting to get too Firefox-y about it, but I think

Re: [AOLSERVER] recent updates

2011-10-19 Thread Jeff Rogers
Brett Schwarz wrote: I'll grab the latest and greatest from SF and start messing around with your changes. Is SF the main repo for aolserver? What about the modules (specifically nspostgres)? Yep, SF is still the place for aolserver and nspostgres (which looks like it has been updated to