Dossy Shiobara wrote:
On 2005.02.08, John Sequeira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could or does? What /does/ the FastCGI ISAPI module for IIS do?
Does it get the NTLM auth data and pass it along, decrypted, to the
FastCGI app.?
Yes and No -- the FastCGI/DLL or cgi-fcgi don't do this on their own.
_IIS_
-protocol patches that may make it into
4.1.0 would address this type of extensibility?
I'm not sure about the fastcgi library's thread safety... that will be
easy to find out.
John Sequeira
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/1780
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from
Dossy Shiobara wrote:
On 2005.02.08, John Sequeira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you sure about this? Do you have network sniffs showing what's
actually happening between the browser and the server(s)?
If Apache's mod_proxy is smart and its Keep-Alive is smart, then
fronting IIS and AOLserver
an out-of-process
persistent interpreter and a web server w/o native support for said
interpreter.
I haven't tried it in AOLServer (just IIS/FCGI.pm), but it's the kind
of thing PHP types have to resort to when they run on IIS. Perhaps it
will work for your p(hp|ython|erl) needs.
John Sequeira
http
/portable.nsd
Although I have probably 99% success running aolserver database commands
with nstcl, I could still benefit from the libnsdb.so routines being
exposed for hard-to-debug corner cases.
John Sequeira
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send
less polished than nstcl, so I
would start there unless you really need more.
John Sequeira
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/1780
Greg Wolff wrote:
Look at http://michael.cleverly.com/nstcl/
It does supports the functions you mention without running AOLserver.
/pgw
Wei Shi [EMAIL PROTECTED
Tilman,
If your app was written portably enough to run under CGI, then I would
recommend going that route with AOLServer.
If you want a performance boost, look into persistent perl, SpeedyCGI
or FastCGI (using the cgi2fastcgi bridge, since AOLServer doesn't
support FastCGI). There might be
What would be the cgi2fastcgi bridge - does it have any advantages
over SpeedyCGI? I didn't find anything regarding this on google.
It's actually cgi-fcgi ... code/docs are here :
http://www.fastcgi.com/devkit/doc/overview.html
The primary advantage of FastCGI is something I don't think you
snip
nsv, on the other hand, nicely supports concurrent access from
multiple theads (and the Tcl threads extensions even more so). I want
something clearly more powerful than nsv, not something which better
in some ways but dramatically worse in at least one major, important
way
Would xotcl's
some adp parsing, but life would be much
easier (read 'compatible') if I could use the debundled libraries for
template parsing.
Incidentally, this could probably be pretty handy for implementing
static code analysis of ADP pages -- a list topic of a few weeks ago.
Thanks,
John Sequeira
[EMAIL
10 matches
Mail list logo
