Dossy Shiobara said:
I haven't tested with the commercial MSVC++ 6.0, only the new Microsoft
Visual C++ Toolkit 2003 compiler.
So it really is free (as in money wise), I didn't realise! That's good
enough then, if they ever stop handing it out for free, there is always
the possibility to switch.
I built Tcl 8.4.6 and AOLserver 4.1.0 (CVS HEAD) and AOLserver 4.0.7. I
Where can I find what's changed between 4.0.7 and 4.1.0 ? I was
wondering whether 4.1.0 contains any features or fixes that would make
it worth upgrading to? I'm currently running 4.0.5 on windows.
A quick update on the
On 2004.07.23, Ramesh Venkitaswaran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I built Tcl 8.4.6 and AOLserver 4.1.0 (CVS HEAD) and AOLserver 4.0.7. I
Where can I find what's changed between 4.0.7 and 4.1.0 ? I was
wondering whether 4.1.0 contains any features or fixes that would make
it worth upgrading to?
Awesome, thanks for the feedback! What OS are you running on your
laptop, by the way? I ran into the silly inbound connection limit on
my WinXP Home laptop -- very annoying.
Win 2K Pro SP4. That is interesting. Since I'm doing testing on my
laptop, I'm the only one who's accessing the site.
On 2004.07.23, Ramesh Venkitaswaran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Awesome, thanks for the feedback! What OS are you running on your
laptop, by the way? I ran into the silly inbound connection limit on
my WinXP Home laptop -- very annoying.
Win 2K Pro SP4. That is interesting. Since I'm doing
I've managed to produce binary builds of AOLserver on Win32 using only
the free Microsoft Visual C++ Toolkit 2003 (and associated SDKs)!
I built Tcl 8.4.6 and AOLserver 4.1.0 (CVS HEAD) and AOLserver 4.0.7. I
don't see myself spending too much time back-porting fixes to 4.0.7 for
Win32, unless
Dossy Shiobara said:
the free Microsoft Visual C++ Toolkit 2003 (and associated SDKs)!
Would it be an option to go really free (without the quotes) and use
http://www.openwatcom.org/?
Cheers,
Bas.
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email
This is great Dossy, thanks!
Other than the type of freeness, which I'd argue isn't the first concern
of most people running AOLserver on Windows, would using Open Watcom provide
any benefits? Microsoft's compiler is pretty much the standard for Windows
developers, and is used by most of the
On 2004.07.22, Bas Scheffers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dossy Shiobara said:
the free Microsoft Visual C++ Toolkit 2003 (and associated SDKs)!
Would it be an option to go really free (without the quotes) and use
http://www.openwatcom.org/?
Someday, I'd like to be able to call AOLserver on
On 2004.07.22, Jamie Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is great Dossy, thanks!
You motivated me by producing your own Win32 builds, so everyone who
wanted Win32 builds should thank you! :-)
Other than the type of freeness, which I'd argue isn't the first concern
of most people running
Other than the type of freeness, which I'd argue isn't the first
concern of most people running AOLserver on Windows, would using Open
Watcom provide any benefits? Microsoft's compiler is pretty much the
standard for Windows developers, and is used by most of the
third-party libraries
On 2004.07.22, Andrew Piskorski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 04:59:25PM -0400, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
I've managed to produce binary builds of AOLserver on Win32 using only
the free Microsoft Visual C++ Toolkit 2003 (and associated SDKs)!
I built Tcl 8.4.6 and AOLserver
12 matches
Mail list logo
