[AOLSERVER] aolserver 4.5 tarball utils/* missing #! line

2006-10-18 Thread Mark Aufflick
I just did an install of aolserver 4.5 from the tarball on sf.net and had to do the following to allow the configure/make/make install cycle work: chmod a+x utils/* added #!/usr/bin/tclsh to the top of utils/*.tcl files Is this expected? I guess the makefile or configure process should be doing

[AOLSERVER] OT: Who owns aolserver.com?

2006-10-18 Thread JM
hi, IIRC aolserver.com is the official site for aolserver... i last visited the site and www.aolserver.com is running under apache... :( Mailing-list DISCLAIMER: This Message may contain confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not

Re: [AOLSERVER] aolserver 4.5 tarball utils/* missing #! line

2006-10-18 Thread Mark Aufflick
Ah I see. Well, the make seems to have worked fine via the Makefile shim, other than the #! line and mode.Alternatively, there could just be a dummy Makefile that outputs some help.Now I'm working on compiling nsoracle under macosx with oracle 10g - some tweaking to the included libraries is

Re: [AOLSERVER] OT: Who owns aolserver.com?

2006-10-18 Thread Bas Scheffers
That's been a sore point for a long time; one that I am trying to solve with Dossy's blessing. Unfortunately, having a busy project at work and building work going on at home hasn't sped things up. I came as far as preparing AOLserver for an OpenACS install, but got stalled there. If anyone -

Re: [AOLSERVER] OT: Who owns aolserver.com?

2006-10-18 Thread Daniël Mantione
Op Wed, 18 Oct 2006, schreef Bas Scheffers: That's been a sore point for a long time; one that I am trying to solve with Dossy's blessing. Unfortunately, having a busy project at work and building work going on at home hasn't sped things up. I came as far as preparing AOLserver for an

Re: [AOLSERVER] OT: Who owns aolserver.com?

2006-10-18 Thread Bas Scheffers
I would guess very, very little; all the downloads will stil be comming from sourceforge, so it's just some page views. Bas. On Wednesday, October 18, 2006 13:12, Chris Kumagai said: Does anyone know what kind of bandwidth would be necessary? -Chris - Original Message - From:

Re: [AOLSERVER] OT: Who owns aolserver.com?

2006-10-18 Thread Thorpe Mayes
Is the problem finding someone to host the site? If so, I will be happy to host the site. Thorpe On Oct 18, 2006, at 7:12 AM, Chris Kumagai wrote: Does anyone know what kind of bandwidth would be necessary? -Chris - Original Message - From: Daniël Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[AOLSERVER] Rolling Access Logs

2006-10-18 Thread Steve Manning
Hi Peeps. I have a small problem with access logs for www.fancydress.com whereby they have started to grow beyond the 2gig limit of my O/S. I'm using the nslog module to roll the logs daily at the moment but I'm wondering of there is a way to roll the logs based on their size (as with

Re: [AOLSERVER] Rolling Access Logs

2006-10-18 Thread Dossy Shiobara
On 2006.10.18, Steve Manning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a small problem with access logs for www.fancydress.com whereby they have started to grow beyond the 2gig limit of my O/S. I'm using the nslog module to roll the logs daily at the moment but I'm wondering of there is a way to roll

Re: [AOLSERVER] OT: Who owns aolserver.com?

2006-10-18 Thread Mark Aufflick
I'm happy to provide some openacs customizing/support. On 10/18/06, Thorpe Mayes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is the problem finding someone to host the site? If so, I will be happy to host the site. Thorpe On Oct 18, 2006, at 7:12 AM, Chris Kumagai wrote: Does anyone know what kind of

[AOLSERVER] aolserver 3.x not running scheduled procs anymore

2006-10-18 Thread Mark Aufflick
I remember some time ago (maybe last year) people complaining that their aolserver 3.x servers stopped running scheduled procs. My sole remaining 3.x site didn't exhibit the problem and I didn't pay too much attention. A few weeks ago, however, my (still sole remaining) aolserver 3 site stopped

Re: [AOLSERVER] aolserver 3.x not running scheduled procs anymore

2006-10-18 Thread Vinod Kurup
On 10/18/06, Mark Aufflick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I remember some time ago (maybe last year) people complaining that their aolserver 3.x servers stopped running scheduled procs. My sole remaining 3.x site didn't exhibit the problem and I didn't pay too much attention. A few weeks ago,

Re: [AOLSERVER] aolserver 3.x not running scheduled procs anymore

2006-10-18 Thread Michael A. Cleverly
On 10/18/06, Mark Aufflick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I remember some time ago (maybe last year) people complaining that their aolserver 3.x servers stopped running scheduled procs. My sole remaining 3.x site didn't exhibit the problem and I didn't pay too much attention. A few weeks ago,

Re: [AOLSERVER] aolserver 3.x not running scheduled procs anymore

2006-10-18 Thread Janine Sisk
The problem was that the very large value we all use for MaxOpen and MaxIdle on the database pools causes an integer overflow (I think) in the time calculation. You need to set them to a smaller value, or set them to zero; that is supposed to have the same effect (keep them open

Re: [AOLSERVER] aolserver 3.x not running scheduled procs anymore

2006-10-18 Thread Dave Siktberg
Here is the message from five months ago that helped me get this fixed on my 3.x system: Forum: OpenACS QA Thread: ad_schedule_proc seems to be failing Author: Michael A. Cleverly Posted: 2006-05-23 12:53:52.861061-07 Let me try and explain: During AOLserver startup, if MaxOpen or MaxIdle is a