[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
[If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ]
[nored un
The following reply was made to PR protocol/2385; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dean Gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: David Birnbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: protocol/2385: microsoft proxy server and apache 1.3 don't seem to
get along
Date: Wed,
The following reply was made to PR protocol/2385; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: David Birnbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dean Gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: protocol/2385: microsoft proxy server and apache 1.3 don't seem to
get along
Date: Wed,
The following reply was made to PR protocol/2385; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dean Gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: David Birnbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: protocol/2385: microsoft proxy server and apache 1.3 don't seem to
get along
Date: Tue,
The following reply was made to PR protocol/2385; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: David Birnbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dean Gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: protocol/2385: microsoft proxy server and apache 1.3 don't seem to
get along
Date: Tue,
The following reply was made to PR protocol/2385; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dean Gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: David Birnbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: protocol/2385: microsoft proxy server and apache 1.3 don't seem to
get along
Date: Mon,
>Number: 2385
>Category: protocol
>Synopsis: microsoft proxy server and apache 1.3 don't seem to get along
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible:apache
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: apache
>Arrival
