wrowe 00/12/29 15:37:46
Modified:htdocs/manual index.html.ja.jis
Log:
Solve the other instance...
s/post/POST/ bugs submitted by Carol Compton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -1 httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/index.html.ja.jis
Inde
wrowe 00/12/29 15:34:37
Modified:htdocs/manual index.html.en
Log:
Whoever is 'washing' the files needs to look for a bug...
Revision ChangesPath
1.44 +1 -1 httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/index.html.en
Index: index.html.en
===
> From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 1:26 PM
>
> Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> >
> > "William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
> > >
> > > every coder subscribed to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] is notified of
> > > every commit (this happens now).
> > >
>
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>
> "William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
> >
> > every coder subscribed to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] is notified of
> > every commit (this happens now).
> >
> > any docco folks that subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are notifed
> > of all pertinant commits (this happens now
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
>
> This isn't to say that either group should be ignorant of the other,
> but for developers _or_ documentors with limited time the traffic
> on the lists precludes them from being one list.
Um, we use computers, yes? So use a filter. Or provide an
alternative.. s
> From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 5:30 AM
>
> apache-docs is its own list.
Here we are agreed (about the conversations, that is). They are
two seperate discussions (although I archive them together myself.)
This isn't to say that either g
Brian Behlendorf wrote:
>
> No, for clarification, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (where commit
> messages for the httpd-docs-1.3 CVS module go, as usual) is not a
> full mailing list, as other module-CVS lists often (but not always)
> are; it, by deliberate decision of those who configured this,
> forwards to
--- "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm subscribed to the cvs list for httpd, so I get all the commits over
> there. I'm subscribed to the apache-docs list, so I'm getting all the
> commits here too.
I'm in the same boat, and it is kind of annoying. +1 on the change (not tha
Folks, I'm moving one part of my questions over to your list to see
if we don't have some happy way to satisfy everyone.
I'm subscribed to the cvs list for httpd, so I get all the commits over
there. I'm subscribed to the apache-docs list, so I'm getting all the
commits here too.
Is it unreasona
Some crufts in the 1.3 doc set...
do we want misc/HTTP_Features.tsv sitting in the docs, or should it move
to a folder such as src/test? It is certainly less than useless to the
average user.
README.rus seems worthless unless we plan to stow it in the root of
httpd-1.3-docs or create a single 'm
Chris Pepper wrote:
>
> I think of depreciated as equivalent to devalued. I'm using
> deprecated as in the HTML specs.
That is correct. 'Deprecated' means (in broad terms) 'use
discouraged, heading for obsolescence and removal, supported
replacement possibly available.'
--
#kenP-)}
11 matches
Mail list logo
