On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Because mod_dll is depricated. Where did you find this link so we can
> do away with it?
>
> The mod_so replaced mod_dll quite a while ago (two years or more.) Mod_so
> offers identical syntax and very similar behavior for multiple OS's.
mod_dl
From: "Rich Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 10:54 PM
> > Yes, this is correct. Also, note the following behavior. If the user
> > enables Multiviews, requests index.html, and creats an index.html.var file
> > amoungst other index.html.xx variants, the index.html.va
Because mod_dll is depricated. Where did you find this link so we can
do away with it?
The mod_so replaced mod_dll quite a while ago (two years or more.) Mod_so
offers identical syntax and very similar behavior for multiple OS's.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Rodent of Unusual Size"
From: "Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 2:43 AM
> Hi,
>
> Here is a localized Croatian index.html and a patch to index.html.var
> Like to see that in the main dist :-)
We always like to include additional translations, but is this ISO-8859-1?
That's the default
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> On Sunday 16 September 2001 01:00 pm, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > In mod/prefork.html in the 2.0 docs, the following is stated:
> >
> > The StartServers, MinSpareServers, MaxSpareServers, and MaxServers
> > regulate how the parent process creates children to serv
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > Yes, it should be MaxClients. I think the name is ridiculously
> > inconsistent with its meaning on MPMs other than prefork, but then that
> > problem has been discussed ad nauseum and I don't think we've ever come to
> > a consensus on what it should re
On Sunday 16 September 2001 01:19 pm, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > In mod/prefork.html in the 2.0 docs, the following is stated:
> >
> > The StartServers, MinSpareServers, MaxSpareServers, and MaxServers
> > regulate how the parent process creates children to se
(Working through antique misfiled mail)
Not acked.
- Forwarded message from Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: OpenBSD + Apache as heavy loaded webserver and
the cgi problem]
Date: Mon, 15 Ja
On Sunday 16 September 2001 01:00 pm, Rich Bowen wrote:
> In mod/prefork.html in the 2.0 docs, the following is stated:
>
> The StartServers, MinSpareServers, MaxSpareServers, and MaxServers
> regulate how the parent process creates children to serve requests.
>
> Is this a typo, or is there a MaxS
Not acked..
- Forwarded message from FabriXio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: "FabriXio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: a broken link
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 21:23:25 +0100
Dear Sirs,
I'm an happy user of Web server Apache on Linux and I like to use it on
windows. I've al
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> In mod/prefork.html in the 2.0 docs, the following is stated:
>
> The StartServers, MinSpareServers, MaxSpareServers, and MaxServers
> regulate how the parent process creates children to serve requests.
>
> Is this a typo, or is there a MaxServers directive
In mod/prefork.html in the 2.0 docs, the following is stated:
The StartServers, MinSpareServers, MaxSpareServers, and MaxServers
regulate how the parent process creates children to serve requests.
Is this a typo, or is there a MaxServers directive somewhere that I'm
not aware of? I know about Max
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Allan Liska wrote:
> I'd really like feedback from everyone as to whether or not this is
> a good start...or if there should be more information included?
This is a great start and a great idea. I would be glad to assist in
whatever capacity I can, particularly since I am
Hello,
As I mentioned earlier this week, I would like to try to improve the
layout of the security docs. I'd really like feedback from people
on this list as to how in-depth the documents should go. As an
example, should we explain how to set permissions for optimal
security in an Apac
Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> Would it be desirable to add .var files to the documentation
> itself. This would (in my mind anyway) have two effects.
> It would improve the performance of sites serving Apache
> documentation, and it would provide lots of examples of how
> to do .var files.
Well, as an un
Hi,
Here is a localized Croatian index.html and a patch to index.html.var
Like to see that in the main dist :-)
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-docs-2.0/docroot/index.html.var,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.3 index.html.va
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Yes, this is correct. Also, note the following behavior. If the user
> enables Multiviews, requests index.html, and creats an index.html.var file
> amoungst other index.html.xx variants, the index.html.var file _WILL_
> take precedence over the f
I appear to be insufficiently clued into the current status of
mod_proxy, so if someone could fill me in, I'd appreciate it.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_proxy.html is not terribly
satisfying, and the only location that I can really find with useful
information is http://cvs.apache.org
18 matches
Mail list logo
