According to Carlos:
> If I remember correctly, the reason why AddIconByType is preferred is
> because you have multiple file extensions. If you addIcon, you would have
> to add the icon for each individual mime type. If you addIconByType, you do
> it only once
And it allows you to specify an
On Sat, 18 Aug 2001, Carlos wrote:
> If I remember correctly, the reason why AddIconByType is preferred is
> because you have multiple file extensions. If you addIcon, you would have to
> add the icon for each individual mime type. If you addIconByType, you do it
> only once
OK, that makes sense
If I remember correctly, the reason why AddIconByType is preferred is
because you have multiple file extensions. If you addIcon, you would have to
add the icon for each individual mime type. If you addIconByType, you do it
only once
Again, the memory is fuzzy
Carlos
Once upon a time, "Rich Bowen
>
To: "Apache Documentation Project" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2001 5:35 PM
Subject: AddIconByType vs AddIcon
> The documentation for AddIcon states:
>
> AddIconByType should be used in preference to AddIcon, when possible.
>
> There is, however, n
The documentation for AddIcon states:
AddIconByType should be used in preference to AddIcon, when possible.
There is, however, no indication as to why this should be, anywhere
that I could find it. Could someone please suggests what the reasons
are for this recommendation?
Thanks.
--
Rich Bowe
