Re: Main index.html (http://www.quantumfx.com/apachedocs/)

Thanks! I guess we'll wait-n-see ;) -Carlos Julia Pond wrote: > > Well, that's a good, reasoned response...especially that it solves some if > not all organizational problems (which is really all anyone can hope for). > And, sure, it's good to wait and see. > > As to "look and feel"...well, in

Re: Main index.html (http://www.quantumfx.com/apachedocs/)

Well, that's a good, reasoned response...especially that it solves some if not all organizational problems (which is really all anyone can hope for). And, sure, it's good to wait and see. As to "look and feel"...well, in that arena there's such a thing as "the devil you know"--not to denigrate any

Re: Main index.html (http://www.quantumfx.com/apachedocs/)

On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Julia Pond wrote: > You did a good job on this. > I agree. I think it is nice. It doesn't solve all the organizational problems we have with the docs, but it is better than what we have. It would, of course, need significant tweaking in terms of what links are where, etc.

Re: Main index.html (http://www.quantumfx.com/apachedocs/)

You did a good job on this. Carlos Ramirez wrote: > Thanks for your comments. I updated the webpage so that no font tags are > used and replaced them with tags. I also validated it against > w3c.org's HTML validator resulting in no errors found (as of this > version). However, I hope to make a g

Re: Main index.html (http://www.quantumfx.com/apachedocs/)

Thanks for your comments. I updated the webpage so that no font tags are used and replaced them with tags. I also validated it against w3c.org's HTML validator resulting in no errors found (as of this version). However, I hope to make a good case for keeping the width requirement of 600 pixels. On

Re: Main index.html (http://www.quantumfx.com/apachedocs/)

On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Carlos Ramirez wrote: > I posted an updated version that shows how new sections can be added. I > added "Configuration Topics" and "Another Topic Goes Here" sections. It > still provides a clean layout... > I like it. I think that some people are going to consider it a litt

RE: Main index.html

This is just a suggested layout with no actual content. Instead use: http://www.apache.org/docs/misc/tutorials.html Phoebe Ip wrote: > > Dear all, > > I can't access those documents. I got the following error message: > > File Not Found > The requested object does not exist at the specified

Re: Main index.html

Are you talking about: http://www.quantumfx.com/apachedocs/ ??? -Carlos Phoebe Ip wrote: > > Dear all, > > I can't access those documents. I got the following error message: > > File Not Found > The requested object does not exist at the specified location. The link > you follow is either

Re: Main index.html

Dear all, I can't access those documents. I got the following error message: File Not Found The requested object does not exist at the specified location. The link you follow is either outdated, inacurate, or the server has been instructed not to let you have it. So, how can I access those docum

Re: Main index.html

I posted an updated version that shows how new sections can be added. I added "Configuration Topics" and "Another Topic Goes Here" sections. It still provides a clean layout... -Carlos Joshua Slive wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Carlos Ramirez wrote: > > > Hello, > > Here is a link to my sug

Re: Main index.html

On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Carlos Ramirez wrote: > Hello, > Here is a link to my suggested layout for the Apache Documentation page. > > http://www.quantumfx.com/apachedocs/ [...] > > Comments/Suggestions?? I think it looks very nice. However, one of the reasons for a redesign is I think we are r

Re: Main index.html

Hello, Here is a link to my suggested layout for the Apache Documentation page. http://www.quantumfx.com/apachedocs/ The following are some of the notable changes (aside from the obvious layout): 1. The Apache header image expanded to 600 pixels instead of the 500 pixels. 2. Release Features ma

Re: Main index.html

On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > I think we need a 'site map'.. Yes, I agree. Now the hard part: - Should the "site map" replace the current main docs page, or supplement it? - What should it look like? Joshua

Re: Main index.html

I think we need a 'site map'.. -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar Apache Software Foundation "Apache Server for Dummies" "Apache Server Unleashed"

Re: Main index.html

On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Chris Pepper wrote: > At 11:44 AM -0700 2000/10/11, Joshua Slive wrote: > >If we are going to add more task/topic specific stuff to > >the docs, then the main documentation page needs to be reorganized. > >A simple idea is attached. The problem is, we are shoving important st

Re: Main index.html

At 11:44 AM -0700 2000/10/11, Joshua Slive wrote: If we are going to add more task/topic specific stuff to the docs, then the main documentation page needs to be reorganized. A simple idea is attached. The problem is, we are shoving important stuff like the FAQ further and further down the page.