Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>- Two or three columns? On my high-res monitors, the two column display
>is nicer, but I can see how it could involve lots of scrolling on
>lower-res displays. We can't please everyone, but what is the best
>compromise?
I think two columns is fine. My b
At 12:40 PM -0800 2000/11/01, Joshua Slive wrote:
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Chris Pepper wrote:
At 10:14 AM -0800 2000/11/01, Joshua Slive wrote:
>- Should we change the headers of the other pages to match this page (with
How hard is it? Is there a logical juncture to change the
whole thing? I
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Chris Pepper wrote:
> At 10:14 AM -0800 2000/11/01, Joshua Slive wrote:
> >- Should we change the headers of the other pages to match this page (with
>
> How hard is it? Is there a logical juncture to change the
> whole thing? Is there a reason to keep the DOCTYPE out o
At 10:14 AM -0800 2000/11/01, Joshua Slive wrote:
You will probably notice I comitted my latest version of the main doc
page.
- Should we change the headers of the other pages to match this page (with
the quick links at the top)> The problem with doing this is, as noted
before, it will involve inc
You will probably notice I comitted my latest version of the main doc
page.
This is NOT intended to close debate on the subject. I just decided that
it was time to move the debate to a new starting point. Not having the
new page was holding up some other stuff. Suggestions/patches/whatever are
s
