On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Andy Doran wrote:
>
> I don't have much experience in talking to this group, but I thought I'd
> try
You are very welcome.
> I feel you need to define what level of help you wish to give. If the idea
> is to hand-hold a newbie, then this list is obviously no where near
>
I don't have much experience in talking to this group, but I thought I'd
try
I feel you need to define what level of help you wish to give. If the idea
is to hand-hold a newbie, then this list is obviously no where near
comprehensive. If it aims to define the terms/definitions used specificall
Following on Chris' comments, here is a patch to directive-dict.html
This wasn't much work, but changing all the docs to use this consistently
would be a chunk, so I would appreciate some feedback on this in advance.
Are these argument-types clear? What others should there be? Is this a
good ide
At 1:46 PM -0700 2001/06/21, Joshua Slive wrote:
One thing that I think confuses many people about the apache docs is
trying to determine what kind of pathname each directive takes. For
example, should a pathname be
1. Absolute
2. Relative to the documentroot
3. Relative to the webspace
3. Relativ
One thing that I think confuses many people about the apache docs is
trying to determine what kind of pathname each directive takes. For
example, should a pathname be
1. Absolute
2. Relative to the documentroot
3. Relative to the webspace
3. Relative to the serverroot
etc...
Some directives are
