Hi
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com wrote:
On Jul 20, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 19:14:57 +0100 (BST)
Nick Burch nick.bu...@alfresco.com wrote:
If you'd like to submit a talk proposal, please visit the conference
website at
Hi Francesco...
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò
ilgro...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to propose to the Apache Syncope (incubating) team a talk about
the project at ApacheCon EU 2012.
Any hint about the track? As Identity Manager, Syncope would naturally
Hi!
Don't think that ApachEE fits good for Etch. ApachEE is focusing purely on our
Java EE core technologies stack.
Same for Syncope, though it's much closer. Would be nice to explain the
overlaps/difference between Syncope and Shiro btw ;)
Maybe we could have a 2nd track which supplements
On 23/07/2012 12:43, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi!
Don't think that ApachEE fits good for Etch. ApachEE is focusing purely on
our Java EE core technologies stack.
Same for Syncope, though it's much closer. Would be nice to explain the
overlaps/difference between Syncope and Shiro btw ;)
Uh,
On 23/07/12 10:21, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Tools track ?
You mean the Apache Daily ?
But I don't think it would be Fair for Flex to be there, I believe it
should be in [1]. Justin what do you think ?
If the project
Hi,
I'm also having difficulties getting James in any of the tracks
listed. Could fit to Apache EE or Web Infrastructure or maybe even
OFBiz. But doesn't identify itself with any of them.
I'll submit a talk about using James as a gateway for email-to-any
(twitter, XMMP, etc. ).
Any suggestions
Hi
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Nick Burch nick.bu...@alfresco.com wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote:
I'm also having difficulties getting James in any of the tracks
listed. Could fit to Apache EE or Web Infrastructure or maybe even
OFBiz. But doesn't identify itself
Hi Nour,
Your logic is reasonable. The only thing that's misleading is the
name. ApacheEE may be a good home for enterprise project not directly
related to Java EE. For instance James can be deployed as a WAR but
not it's not usually the case. That being said I think ApacheEE is the
more likely
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org
On 23/07/2012 12:43, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi!
Don't think that ApachEE fits good for Etch. ApachEE is focusing purely on our
Java EE core technologies stack.
Same for Syncope, though it's much closer. Would be nice to explain the
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote:
If it's ok with you I'll like to add it myself to ApacheEE track.
Go ahead and submit your proposal to that track!
The only request I have is to tell me how I can do that so I can be of
help with page editing in the future. I've missed that course
On 23/07/2012 15:15, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org
On 23/07/2012 12:43, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi!
Don't think that ApachEE fits good for Etch. ApachEE is focusing
purely on our Java EE core technologies stack.
Same for Syncope, though it's much
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org
On 23/07/2012 15:15, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org
On 23/07/2012 12:43, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi!
Don't think that ApachEE fits good for Etch. ApachEE is focusing
purely on our Java EE core technologies
Hi,
I just proposed a few talks on ActiveMQ under Camel in Action track.
If those are accepted, I think it'd be better to have a separate
Messaging track for these and other potentially related talks.
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
Senior Software Engineer | FuseSource Corp.
dej...@fusesource.com |
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Ted Yu wrote:
https://tac-apply.apache.org/ still refers to ApacheCon NA 2011
Vancouverhttp://na11.apachecon.com/
When can it be ready for ApacheCon EU 2012 ?
All being well, in about 4 or 5 hours, so I'm told by Gav. As mentioned in
a previous thread last week, the
On 23/07/12 12:06, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
Maybe we could have a 2nd track which supplements the ApachEE core track and showcases
the different Enterprise Integration scenarios.
This sounds reasonable to me and in the direction of the aborted
Integration Service APIs track [4].
Maybe
Hi Ioan...
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Ioan Eugen Stan stan.ieu...@gmail.comwrote:
2012/7/23 Ioan Eugen Stan stan.ieu...@gmail.com:
Hi Nour,
Your logic is reasonable. The only thing that's misleading is the
name. ApacheEE may be a good home for enterprise project not directly
Hi Nick...
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Nick Burch nick.bu...@alfresco.com wrote:
On 23/07/12 12:06, Francesco Chicchiriccň wrote:
Maybe we could have a 2nd track which supplements the ApachEE core track
and showcases the different Enterprise Integration scenarios.
This sounds
Doesn't that make more reasonable to turn Camel In Action track into
Integration and maybe Messaging and Integration track ?
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Nick Burch nick.bu...@alfresco.com wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
I just proposed a few talks on ActiveMQ under Camel
Would it be better to add an unclassified track for tings that don't fit? The
difficulty with this is that it should really have been part of the CfP ...
regards
Steve
On Jul 23, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Doesn't that make more reasonable to turn Camel In Action track
On another thought, why not the already existing Camel track chair to be
the same for the one that might be named (Enterprise) Integration track ?
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Nick...
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Nick Burch
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com wrote:
Would it be better to add an unclassified track for tings that don't
fit? The difficulty with this is that it should really have been part of
the CfP ...
But unclassified would be sort of a misleading and I am afraid
Hi,
But I don't think it would be Fair for Flex to be there, I believe it
should be in [1]. Justin what do you think ?
It doesn't really fit into Apache Daily track as it is not a tool but a client
side programming framework.
Flex is more a enterprise product so there's some fit and while
22 matches
Mail list logo
