Missatge de Jaume Ortolà i Font del dia dc., 18 de
set. 2019 a les 11:05:
> Thanks for the answers.
>
> Missatge de Jonathan Washington del dia
> dt., 17 de set. 2019 a les 22:11:
>
>> Jaume, are you planning on using this for translation or something else?
>> If for translation, how do you
Missatge de Kevin Brubeck Unhammer del dia dc., 18 de
set. 2019 a les 12:02:
> > I have tried adding a mark to the newly formed words and removing it with
> > CG if necessary. It works fine.
>
> Why not keep it all the way through the translator? That seems safer to
> me, and you don't have to
Jaume Ortolà i Font
čálii:
> I have tried adding a mark to the newly formed words and removing it with
> CG if necessary. It works fine.
Why not keep it all the way through the translator? That seems safer to
me, and you don't have to worry that they may not be synonymous.
signature.asc
Thanks for the answers.
Missatge de Jonathan Washington del dia
dt., 17 de set. 2019 a les 22:11:
> Jaume, are you planning on using this for translation or something else?
> If for translation, how do you anticipate it improving translation quality?
>
These prefixes will be used for
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019, 14:58 Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
wrote:
>
> The upside is that you can combine words without listing everything
> twice. If you've only got one prefix, the HFST-like method is probably
> better. If you're combining lots, compounding may be worth considering.
>
We can and do
Jaume Ortolà i Font
čálii:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to be able to translate automatically certain words formed by
> "a certain prefix + a certain POS" without having to add new entries to the
> dictionaries. For example, any word formed by "anti" + any valid adjective
> in translations spa<>cat:
>
Hi,
I would like to be able to translate automatically certain words formed by
"a certain prefix + a certain POS" without having to add new entries to the
dictionaries. For example, any word formed by "anti" + any valid adjective
in translations spa<>cat:
antihúngaro <> antihongarès
antihúngaras
