subschemasubentry in root DSE. And
they all return the schema in what seems to be the RFC format. There may
be some issues, of course. But it looks like that the support for these
servers should not be difficult to implement.
--
Radovan Semancik
it ... is there
anything that I should read to be able to contribute? Or some
recommendations?
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
as
an obvious bug.
But when I've changed it to return true then the
SchemaObjectRendererTest fails ... in a quite strange way (NPE). I do
not feel to be very strong here and I'm not really sure what I'm doing.
Could anyone please have a look and help me out?
Thanks.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software
that there is a nicer way to do that. I
mean the encoding of this part of VLV request control:
target CHOICE { ...
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
be muted when a quirks mode is on? Or is that too much and we need
something like superquirks mode? ;-) The studio obviously works with
OpenLDAP. Does anybody know how does the studio manages this?
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 03/20/2015 04:07 PM, Radovan Semancik wrote:
https://github.com/Evolveum/directory-shared/commit/b941ff690a41cd03b31679759dcf2fb367b1cb83
I had a closer look at this. Tests are failing after my modification.
The reason seems to be this: (Registries:1344)
public ListThrowable add
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40{64512}
X-NDS_NAME 'RADIUS:Active Con nections' X-NDS_NOT_SCHED_SYNC_IMMEDIATE '1' )
I could not believe my eyes when I've seen that. I still hope that this
is really some kind of my error. But I have confirmed it in two
independent instances of eDirectory 8.8.
--
Radovan
On 08/10/2015 03:10 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 10/08/15 13:33, Radovan Semancik a écrit :
On 08/10/2015 12:42 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
There is no flag that says an Attribute is H-R or not. The
information is provided in RFC 22524.3.2
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2252#section-4.3.2
is using StringValue then you will not need to change
anything. Interface will remain the same and behavior compatible (if you
do not think about comaptible bugs of course).
Life is complicated...
Maybe not that much :-)
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
cannot report back to the higher layers anything better
than failed to add foo to bar. But the user will not know what was the
reason.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
with the BinaryValue,
StringValue and H/R flags. Simplification will be a great help for new
API users.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
of relaxed mode to the registries
(OidRegistry class). Set this up when the registries are created. Skip
the Oid.isOid() check when in relaxed mode.
I can quickly implement any of these options. But as usual, I need a
blessing :-)
What do you think?
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
and the studio. So I've figured it is better to
stay on the safe side and discuss that before implementing it.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
client code compatibility.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
fashion? E.g.
prepare the string only if someone asks for it and then store the
prepared value for the entire Value lifetime. If Value is immutable then
this approach should be safe.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 03/24/2016 12:44 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi guys
Hi,
Congrats. This looks like a great improvement.
But ... it would be probably good to release API 1.0.0 before you merge
in the branch. Any plans for that?
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 05/09/2016 12:38 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi !
that's it, I'm done
this. Is InvalidConnectionException the same
situation as timeout? Wouldn't we want a new TimeOutException for this
(as subclass of LdapException)? Or is there any other (e.g. Mina-based)
mechanism for this?
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
; has some date :-)
At least some estimate.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
handling would not be that easy to do. I see that as something that is
definitely after 1.0.0. SASL external would be nice, but if there is nobody to
work on that in next couple of weeks (not me) then I see no point holding back
1.0.0. just for that.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
Hi,
This looks like a nice development. Thanks. I'll test it with my
multi-LDAP testbed. But it will take a week or two until I get to that.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 01/23/2017 10:23 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi guys,
a quick update on what's going
=COM and dc=example,dc=com are
considered to be different.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
ther thing that. But that can wait. Let's have
the 1.0 release out so we can start fixing things properly.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
are wrong.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 09/08/2017 04:11 PM, CRAIG BENNER wrote:
Thanks Shawn, I was going to ask that. But I got wireshark working. Below is
the packet I'm assuming we want to see. In concept it looks correct, but i'm
not sure what the controlValue
(org.apache.directory.api.ldap.extras.controls.ad.AdDirSync). It is
enough to have some basic idea how LDAP protocol works and how the API
works. Most of the work is mostly copy There are 3-4 classes to
create. It is not difficult to figure out.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 09/03/2017 08:57 PM
to be very rare. If you start with existing control that
is somehow similar it is not difficult to implement a new control.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
ll test those
later.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 05/16/2018 10:25 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi !
I finally committed the new parser. I did my best to have the same
API, so ou can use it as if it were the previous version, except that
it does not use AntLR anymore.
T
PI version. And the I can run the tests with my
private directory server ZOO.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 04/15/2018 11:03 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm trying to speedup the schema parsing (it's currently quite slow, due
to the 3 embedded Antlr parsers we
27 matches
Mail list logo
